Julian Martin Michael

Julian Martin Michael is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in family law and division of matrimonial assets.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Julian Martin Michael has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and family law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	2 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Julian Martin Michael has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Julian Martin Michael has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Julian Martin Michael has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Julian Martin Michael has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Child)	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Julian Martin Michael has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Julian Martin Michael has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Julian Martin Michael has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Julian Martin Michael has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Julian Martin Michael has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Julian Martin Michael has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Proceedings	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Julian Martin Michael has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Islamic Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Julian Martin Michael has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Julian Martin Michael has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Financial Relief	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Julian Martin Michael has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Julian Martin Michael has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Julian Martin Michael has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Mahmood Gaznavi Chambers LLC	2 cases	100% of cases	UJM v UJL: Leave to Appeal, Division of Matrimonial Assets & Costs in Divorce(Dec 2021) UJM v UJL: Appeal on Financial Relief Consequential to Foreign Matrimonial Proceedings(Aug 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Julian Martin Michael's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Julian Martin Michael's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	5,000.00	2,500.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	UJM v UJL: Leave to Appeal, Division of Matrimonial Assets & Costs in Divorce 14 Dec 2021 UJM (Applicant)Lost	14 Dec 2021	UJM (Applicant): Application DismissedOriginating Summons dismissed. The Husband is to pay costs of $5,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore) (all-in) to the Wife.
2	UJM v UJL: Appeal on Financial Relief Consequential to Foreign Matrimonial Proceedings 25 Aug 2021 UJM (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	25 Aug 2021	UJM (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal dismissedThe Husband's appeal was dismissed. The court ordered the Husband to pay the Wife $10,000 inclusive of disbursements for the appeal. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.