June Lim Pei Ling

June Lim Pei Ling is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in company law and derivative action. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

June Lim Pei Ling has demonstrated expertise across 18 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and fiduciary duties.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	June Lim Pei Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	June Lim Pei Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	June Lim Pei Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	June Lim Pei Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	June Lim Pei Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Derivative action	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	June Lim Pei Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	June Lim Pei Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Custody of Children	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	June Lim Pei Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	June Lim Pei Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	June Lim Pei Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Abduction	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	June Lim Pei Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Charterparty	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	June Lim Pei Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	June Lim Pei Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	June Lim Pei Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	June Lim Pei Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	June Lim Pei Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Relocation Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	June Lim Pei Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Care and Control	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	June Lim Pei Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

June Lim Pei Ling has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Eden Law Corporation	1 cases	33% of cases	XBF v XBE: Appeal Against Orders for Care & Control and Relocation of Children to Indonesia(Nov 2024)
Via Law Corporation	1 cases	33% of cases	Nordic International v. Innhaug: Director's Breach of Fiduciary Duty in Charterparty Assignment(Jan 2017)
One Legal LLC	1 cases	33% of cases	Sinwa SS (HK) Co Ltd v Nordic International Ltd: Derivative Action & Limitation Act(Jun 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of June Lim Pei Ling's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.5 parties avg	2.5	67%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of June Lim Pei Ling's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(67%)	67%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	XBF v XBE: Appeal Against Orders for Care & Control and Relocation of Children to Indonesia 07 Nov 2024 XBE (Respondent)Lost	07 Nov 2024	XBE (Respondent): Orders ReversedThe costs below are to be reversed and paid by the Respondent to the Appellant instead. I order the Respondent to pay the Appellant the costs of this appeal at $4,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
2	Nordic International v. Innhaug: Director's Breach of Fiduciary Duty in Charterparty Assignment 03 Jan 2017 Nordic International Limited (Plaintiff)Won	03 Jan 2017	Nordic International Limited (Plaintiff): Claim AllowedClaim allowed; an account to be taken of the profits which Morten has made in procuring the purported assignment. The quantum of compensation that Morten is liable to Nordic International for causing the withholding of charter hire is to be reserved for assessment until the conclusion of the arbitration between Nordic International and BGP. Nordic International shall have liberty to apply for that assessment to be restored following the outcome of the arbitration. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Sinwa SS (HK) Co Ltd v Nordic International Ltd: Derivative Action & Limitation Act 06 Jun 2016 Sinwa SS (HK) Co Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	06 Jun 2016	Sinwa SS (HK) Co Ltd (Plaintiff): Application DismissedApplication for leave to commence arbitration proceedings against Nordic Maritime dismissed. Costs of $60,000 excluding disbursements is awarded to Mr Innhaug. Disbursements discounted to $20,000, to be paid by Sinwa to Mr Innhaug. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.