Jupiter Kong

Jupiter Kong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2001. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in patents and ad hoc admission. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jupiter Kong has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in patents and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Patents	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jupiter Kong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jupiter Kong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Jupiter Kong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jupiter Kong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Unfair Competition	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jupiter Kong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Ad Hoc Admission	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jupiter Kong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jupiter Kong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Groundless threat	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jupiter Kong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Patent Infringement	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jupiter Kong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Compensation Fund	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Jupiter Kong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jupiter Kong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Purposive Construction	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jupiter Kong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Jupiter Kong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jupiter Kong has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier	2 cases	67% of cases	Bean Innovations v Flexon: Patent Infringement, Groundless Threat, Mailbox Assembly(May 2001) Lifestyle 1.99 Pte Ltd v S$1.99 Pte Ltd: Passing Off & Goodwill in Retail Business(Apr 2000)
Drew & Napier LLC	1 cases	33% of cases	Howe v Thomas: Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel in Singapore Patent Infringement Action(Aug 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jupiter Kong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.5 parties avg	3.5	67%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	24.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jupiter Kong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(67%)	67%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Howe v Thomas: Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel in Singapore Patent Infringement Action 13 Aug 2001 Fico BV (Plaintiff, Applicant)Lost	13 Aug 2001	Fico BV (Plaintiff, Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for ad hoc admission of Queen's Counsel to represent Fico BV was dismissed.
2	Bean Innovations v Flexon: Patent Infringement, Groundless Threat, Mailbox Assembly 25 May 2001 Flexon (Pte) Ltd (Respondent)Won	25 May 2001	Flexon (Pte) Ltd (Respondent): Claim AllowedFlexon's claim that the threats were unjustifiable was allowed, and the appellant's counterclaim was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Lifestyle 1.99 Pte Ltd v S$1.99 Pte Ltd: Passing Off & Goodwill in Retail Business 11 Apr 2000 S$1.99 Pte Ltd (trading as ONE.99 SHOP) (Respondent)Lost	11 Apr 2000	S$1.99 Pte Ltd (trading as ONE.99 SHOP) (Respondent): Claim DismissedThe respondent's claim was dismissed, and the injunction was lifted.