Jurena Chan Pei Shan

Jurena Chan Pei Shan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in constitutional law and ad hoc admission. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jurena Chan Pei Shan has demonstrated expertise across 7 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and constitutional law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	2 cases	22% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Jurena Chan Pei Shan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 22% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	2 cases	22% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jurena Chan Pei Shan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 22% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jurena Chan Pei Shan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Ad Hoc Admission	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized100% relevance score	Jurena Chan Pei Shan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jurena Chan Pei Shan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jurena Chan Pei Shan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Human Rights	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jurena Chan Pei Shan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jurena Chan Pei Shan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	2 cases	100% of cases	Lim Meng Suang v Attorney-General: Constitutionality of Section 377A and Equal Protection(Oct 2014) Re Lord Goldsmith: Ad Hoc Admission & Constitutionality of Section 377A Penal Code(Sep 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jurena Chan Pei Shan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	23.5 parties avg	3.5	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jurena Chan Pei Shan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lim Meng Suang v Attorney-General: Constitutionality of Section 377A and Equal Protection 27 Oct 2014 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	27 Oct 2014	Attorney-General (Respondent): Appeals DismissedAppeals dismissed; no order as to costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Re Lord Goldsmith: Ad Hoc Admission & Constitutionality of Section 377A Penal Code 18 Sep 2013 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	18 Sep 2013	Attorney-General (Respondent): Opposition UpheldThe Attorney-General's opposition to the application was upheld.