Justin

Justin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in banking law and chancery and equity. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Justin has demonstrated expertise across 11 primary practice areas, with significant experience in banking law and chancery and equity.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Banking Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Justin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Justin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Justin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Justin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Justin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Justin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Justin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Justin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Laches	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Justin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Electronic banking	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Justin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Electronic funds transfer	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Justin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Justin has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
JWS Asia Law Corporation	1 cases	50% of cases	Malayan Banking Bhd v Barclays Bank PLC: Implied Contract & SWIFT Transfers(Apr 2019)
Tito Isaac & Co LLP	1 cases	50% of cases	Ng So Hang v Wong Sang Woo: Constructive & Resulting Trusts, Proprietary Estoppel, Property Dispute(Jul 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Justin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Justin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1
USD	871,085.61	871,085.611 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Malayan Banking Bhd v Barclays Bank PLC: Implied Contract & SWIFT Transfers 11 Apr 2019 Barclays Bank PLC (Defendant)Lost	11 Apr 2019	Barclays Bank PLC (Defendant): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment against the Defendant in the amount of US$871,085.61, being the equivalent of the interbank settlement amount specified in the MT 103 STP.
2	Ng So Hang v Wong Sang Woo: Constructive & Resulting Trusts, Proprietary Estoppel, Property Dispute 15 Jul 2018 Ng So Hang (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim)Won	15 Jul 2018	Ng So Hang (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim): Prayers (1), (2) and (3) of the Statement of Claim were grantedThe Plaintiff was granted the declaration sought, and the Defendant's counterclaim was dismissed. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore)