Justin Ee

Justin Ee is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in anti-suit injunction and natural forum. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Justin Ee has demonstrated expertise across 23 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and jurisdiction.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	4 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Justin Ee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Justin Ee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Justin Ee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Justin Ee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Justin Ee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Justin Ee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Justin Ee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Justin Ee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Justin Ee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Justin Ee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Justin Ee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Justin Ee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Auditing Standards	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Justin Ee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Financial Advisory	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Justin Ee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Justin Ee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Accounting Services	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Justin Ee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Equitable Set-Off	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Justin Ee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Justin Ee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Tortious liability	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Justin Ee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Justin Ee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Justin Ee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Justin Ee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Justin Ee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Justin Ee has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
TSMP Law Corporation	4 cases	100% of cases	Vibrant Group Ltd v Tong Chi Ho: Dispute over Jurisdiction in Negligence Claim(Jul 2022) Vibrant Group Ltd v Tong Chi Ho: Forum Non Conveniens & Service Out of Jurisdiction(Mar 2022) Baker v BCS: Anti-Suit Injunction Granted in Ethocyn Rights Trust Dispute(Nov 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Justin Ee's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.2
Complex Cases: 4 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	15.0 parties avg	5.0	25%
Lost	24.0 parties avg	4.0	50%
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2021	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2022	24.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Justin Ee's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(25%)	25%
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Partial	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Vibrant Group Ltd v Tong Chi Ho: Dispute over Jurisdiction in Negligence Claim 03 Jul 2022 Vibrant Group Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	03 Jul 2022	Vibrant Group Ltd (Plaintiff): Leave Order set asideThe court set aside the Leave Order, meaning the plaintiff cannot serve the 3rd defendant out of jurisdiction.
2	Vibrant Group Ltd v Tong Chi Ho: Forum Non Conveniens & Service Out of Jurisdiction 31 Mar 2022 Vibrant Group Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	31 Mar 2022	Vibrant Group Ltd (Plaintiff): Application dismissedThe 2nd Defendant's application to set aside the Leave Orders and stay the proceedings was dismissed.
3	Baker v BCS: Anti-Suit Injunction Granted in Ethocyn Rights Trust Dispute 18 Nov 2021 Renslade Holdings Limited (Defendant)Partial	18 Nov 2021	Renslade Holdings Limited (Defendant): Anti-suit injunction granted in partAnti-suit injunction granted in part, restraining the defendants from relitigating the existence, validity, and enforceability of a trust over Ethocyn rights, but allowing them to pursue claims related to Baker's alleged misrepresentation and the settlement agreement with Nu Skin.
4	Ong Han Ling v American International Assurance: Insurance Fraud, Vicarious Liability & Conspiracy 28 Dec 2017 MOTION INSURANCE AGENCY PTE LTD (Defendant)Dismissed	28 Dec 2017	MOTION INSURANCE AGENCY PTE LTD (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe plaintiffs’ claims against Motion are dismissed with costs.