Justin William Jeremiah

Justin William Jeremiah is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2023 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fiduciary duties and civil procedure. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Justin William Jeremiah has demonstrated expertise across 24 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and civil litigation.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	Justin William Jeremiah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Justin William Jeremiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Justin William Jeremiah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Justin William Jeremiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Justin William Jeremiah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Justin William Jeremiah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Justin William Jeremiah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Justin William Jeremiah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Justin William Jeremiah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Quantification of Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Justin William Jeremiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Justin William Jeremiah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Justin William Jeremiah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Assets	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Justin William Jeremiah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Justin William Jeremiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Expert evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Justin William Jeremiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Justin William Jeremiah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Justin William Jeremiah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Justin William Jeremiah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Justin William Jeremiah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Justin William Jeremiah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Justin William Jeremiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Justin William Jeremiah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Justin William Jeremiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Equitable Compensation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Justin William Jeremiah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Justin William Jeremiah has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	3 cases	100% of cases	Credit Suisse Trust Ltd v Ivanishvili: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Equitable Compensation(Jul 2024) M Badiuzzaman v Salma Islam: Defamation Claim by Singaporean Family Against Bangladeshi Media(Oct 2023) Ivanishvili v Credit Suisse: Breach of Trust, Quantification of Losses & Costs(Sep 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Justin William Jeremiah's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 8.1
Complex Cases: 3 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	16.0 parties avg	6.0	33%
Partial	28.5 parties avg	8.5	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2023	28.5 parties avg	8.5
2024	16.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Justin William Jeremiah's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Partial	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	100,000.00	100,000.001 cases	1
USD	1,485,460,000.00	742,730,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2023	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Credit Suisse Trust Ltd v Ivanishvili: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Equitable Compensation 04 Jul 2024 Credit Suisse Trust Limited (Appellant)Partial	04 Jul 2024	Credit Suisse Trust Limited (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartThe appeal was allowed in part, with adjustments to the quantification of compensation. The original award was US$742.73m. The final amount will be adjusted based on the court's findings. Assumed USD, as the judgment involves US dollar amounts and the underlying transactions were denominated in US dollars.
2	M Badiuzzaman v Salma Islam: Defamation Claim by Singaporean Family Against Bangladeshi Media 29 Oct 2023 Tania Zaman (Claimant)Partial	29 Oct 2023	Tania Zaman (Claimant): General Damages AwardedAwarded $10,000 against the 1st and 2nd defendants (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Ivanishvili v Credit Suisse: Breach of Trust, Quantification of Losses & Costs 18 Sep 2023 Credit Suisse Trust Limited (Defendant)Lost	18 Sep 2023	Credit Suisse Trust Limited (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantThe defendant breached its duty to the plaintiffs to safeguard the Trust assets as at 30 March 2008 and is liable to compensate the plaintiffs for their loss. The defendant shall pay to a Trust Fund, the trustee of such fund being identified by the plaintiffs to be the 2nd plaintiff, the sum of US$742.73m, being the plaintiffs’ losses calculated in accordance with Model 1B from 30 March 2008 to 26 May 2023 and taking into account the Settlement dated 1 December 2022.