K Jayakumar Naidu

K Jayakumar Naidu is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2005 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and sentencing. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 43% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

K Jayakumar Naidu has demonstrated expertise across 36 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	7 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	K Jayakumar Naidu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	6 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	K Jayakumar Naidu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	5 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	K Jayakumar Naidu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	K Jayakumar Naidu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	K Jayakumar Naidu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	K Jayakumar Naidu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Appeal	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	K Jayakumar Naidu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	K Jayakumar Naidu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Traffic Violations	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	K Jayakumar Naidu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	K Jayakumar Naidu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	K Jayakumar Naidu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	K Jayakumar Naidu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	K Jayakumar Naidu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	K Jayakumar Naidu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Abetment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	K Jayakumar Naidu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	K Jayakumar Naidu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	K Jayakumar Naidu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Road Rage	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	K Jayakumar Naidu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Women’s Charter	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	K Jayakumar Naidu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Human Trafficking Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	K Jayakumar Naidu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	K Jayakumar Naidu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating course of justice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	K Jayakumar Naidu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	K Jayakumar Naidu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Consent of Public Prosecutor	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	K Jayakumar Naidu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Irregularities in proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	K Jayakumar Naidu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Defective consent of Public Prosecutor	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	K Jayakumar Naidu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Curative powers of court	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	K Jayakumar Naidu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Charge	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	K Jayakumar Naidu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	K Jayakumar Naidu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Alteration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	K Jayakumar Naidu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	K Jayakumar Naidu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	K Jayakumar Naidu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	K Jayakumar Naidu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	K Jayakumar Naidu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	K Jayakumar Naidu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	K Jayakumar Naidu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

K Jayakumar Naidu has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Jay Law Corporation	4 cases	57% of cases	Rajendran v Public Prosecutor: Women's Charter, PHTA & Penal Code Offences(Aug 2021) Neo Chuan Sheng v Public Prosecutor: Dangerous Driving, Road Traffic Act Appeal(May 2020) Public Prosecutor v Tan Zhenyang: Appeal Against Sentence for Voluntarily Causing Hurt in Parking Dispute(Sep 2018)
Jay Associates	1 cases	14% of cases	PP v Selamat Bin Paki: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Oct 2016)
Kertar & Co	1 cases	14% of cases	PP v Daniel Vijay: Joint Murder Charge for Robbery Resulting in Death(Jul 2008)
Segeram and Co	1 cases	14% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Vanmaichelvan: Drug Trafficking Sentence Appeal(Apr 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of K Jayakumar Naidu's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.1
Complex Cases: 3 (43%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	53.2 parties avg	3.2	71%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	14%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	14%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2005	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2008	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2016	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2018	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of K Jayakumar Naidu's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(71%)	71%
Neutral	1(14%)	14%
Partial	1(14%)	14%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	5,000.00	2,500.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2005	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Rajendran v Public Prosecutor: Women's Charter, PHTA & Penal Code Offences 24 Aug 2021 Rajendran s/o Nagarethinam (Appellant)Partial	24 Aug 2021	Rajendran s/o Nagarethinam (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part. Conviction on Charge 2 overturned. Charge 3 amended to attempted recruitment. Sentences adjusted accordingly. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Neo Chuan Sheng v Public Prosecutor: Dangerous Driving, Road Traffic Act Appeal 17 May 2020 Neo Chuan Sheng (Appellant)Lost	17 May 2020	Neo Chuan Sheng (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the disqualification order was dismissed.
3	Public Prosecutor v Tan Zhenyang: Appeal Against Sentence for Voluntarily Causing Hurt in Parking Dispute 27 Sep 2018 Tan Zhenyang (Respondent)Lost	27 Sep 2018	Tan Zhenyang (Respondent): Sentence IncreasedOriginal fine of $5,000 replaced with a 5-week imprisonment sentence (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). The fine of $5,000 is to be refunded.
4	Ali bin Mohamad Bahashwan v Public Prosecutor: Abetment, Misuse of Drugs Act & Statutory Interpretation 04 Mar 2018 Ragunath Nair A/L Janartanan (Appellant)Lost	04 Mar 2018	Ragunath Nair A/L Janartanan (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
5	PP v Selamat Bin Paki: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 19 Oct 2016 Ragunath Nair A/L Janartan (Defendant)Lost	19 Oct 2016	Ragunath Nair A/L Janartan (Defendant): Guilty as chargedFound guilty of trafficking in a controlled drug, namely, diamorphine.
6	PP v Daniel Vijay: Joint Murder Charge for Robbery Resulting in Death 27 Jul 2008 Daniel Vijay s/o Katherasan (Defendant)Lost	27 Jul 2008	Daniel Vijay s/o Katherasan (Defendant): Guilty as chargedConvicted and passed the mandatory death sentence.
7	Public Prosecutor v Vanmaichelvan: Drug Trafficking Sentence Appeal 21 Apr 2005 S Manogaran (Other)Neutral	21 Apr 2005	S Manogaran (Other): -