K Muralitherapany

K Muralitherapany is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 17 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in shipping law and director's duties. Their track record shows a 24.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 29% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

K Muralitherapany has demonstrated expertise across 84 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	14 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 14 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	11 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	7 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	6 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	5 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice13% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Tenancy Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Carriage of goods by sea	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Dividends	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ship Mortgage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Tenancy Agreements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Demurrage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interest	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale Pendente Lite	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equity of Redemption	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Tenancy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale of Property	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Lending and security	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
General Principles	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Court Order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Hotel Management Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fund Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Share Sale Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admiralty Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Freight	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Voyage Charter	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Interference with Trade	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ship Repair Services	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ship-brokering	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arrest of Vessel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Charter Parties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Charterparty Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Leasing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Investments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	K Muralitherapany has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

K Muralitherapany has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 15 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Joseph Tan Jude Benny LLP	15 cases	88% of cases	Powercom Co v Sunpower Semiconductor: Enforcement of Foreign Judgment & Limitation Act(Mar 2024) M Asset Pte Ltd v Inngroup Pte Ltd: Breach of Settlement Agreement & Damages for Loss of Tenancy(May 2021) Inngroup Pte Ltd v M Asset Pte Ltd: Breach of Settlement Agreement for Shophouse Renovation(Sep 2020)
Joseph Tan Jude Benny	1 cases	6% of cases	International Connex Holdings v Chan Shing On: Breach of Directors' Duties in Joint Venture(Dec 2007)
Gabriel Peter & Partners	1 cases	6% of cases	Abdul Razak Valibhoy v Keppel Investment Management Ltd: Breach of Contract and Fiduciary Duty in Investment Management(Oct 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of K Muralitherapany's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 5 (29%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	22.0 parties avg	2.0	12%
Lost	73.3 parties avg	3.3	41%
Neutral	16.0 parties avg	6.0	6%
Partial	33.0 parties avg	3.0	18%
Won	42.0 parties avg	2.0	24%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2010	43.0 parties avg	3.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2015	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of K Muralitherapany's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	2(12%)	12%
Lost	7(41%)	41%
Neutral	1(6%)	6%
Partial	3(18%)	18%
Won	4(24%)	24%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	128,120.62	12,812.0610 cases	10
USD	162,000.00	81,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	4 211	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2015	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 17 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Powercom Co v Sunpower Semiconductor: Enforcement of Foreign Judgment & Limitation Act 26 Mar 2024 Sunpower Semiconductor Limited (Defendant)Lost	26 Mar 2024	Sunpower Semiconductor Limited (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment entered against the defendant to enforce the District Court Judgment in favour of the plaintiff. Costs to be paid by the defendant to the plaintiff, to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	M Asset Pte Ltd v Inngroup Pte Ltd: Breach of Settlement Agreement & Damages for Loss of Tenancy 11 May 2021 M Asset Pte Ltd (Appellant)Partial	11 May 2021	M Asset Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal dismissed in part. Decision on liability and damages affirmed; costs order varied. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Inngroup Pte Ltd v M Asset Pte Ltd: Breach of Settlement Agreement for Shophouse Renovation 15 Sep 2020 M Asset Pte Ltd (Defendant)Dismissed	15 Sep 2020	M Asset Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedDefendant's counterclaim was dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Summer Star Maritime SA v Owner of NUR ALLYA: Extension of Writ Validity & Limitation in Admiralty Collision Claim 15 Aug 2018 GSM Puteri Maritime SA (Plaintiff)Lost	15 Aug 2018	GSM Puteri Maritime SA (Plaintiff): Application dismissedPlaintiff's application to set aside the Extension Orders was dismissed. No order as to costs.
5	RGA Holdings v Loh Choon Phing: Interim Injunction for Breach of Contractual Covenant 24 Sep 2017 RGA Holdings International Inc (Appellant)Partial	24 Sep 2017	RGA Holdings International Inc (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; interim prohibitory injunction granted; costs of the appeal fixed at $15,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Forest Fibers Inc v K K Asia Environmental Pte Ltd: Injunctions & Civil Procedure 26 Dec 2016 RGA Holdings International Inc (Plaintiff)Lost	26 Dec 2016	RGA Holdings International Inc (Plaintiff): Application dismissedThe plaintiff's application for an injunction was dismissed.
7	Freight Connect v Paragon Shipping: Charterparty Breach & Detention Charges 30 Jul 2015 Paragon Shipping Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	30 Jul 2015	Paragon Shipping Pte Ltd (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentJudgment for Respondent; damages awarded in the amount of $81,000 (assumed USD, as the judgment specifies amounts in USD).
8	Ramindo Sukses Perkasa v Sim Kwang Oo: Striking Out for Contempt of Court Orders 24 Mar 2015 Ramindo Sukses Perkasa Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Dismissed	24 Mar 2015	Ramindo Sukses Perkasa Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Claim Struck OutOriginating Summons No 463 of 2012 was struck out for non-compliance with court orders.
9	Paragon Shipping v Freight Connect: Charter Party Dispute over Cargo Transport from China to Singapore 25 Aug 2014 Paragon Shipping Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	25 Aug 2014	Paragon Shipping Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff in the sum of US$81,000 and interest, plus indemnity against any sum the plaintiff may be liable to pay FLS. Assumed USD, as the judgment involves amounts originally quoted in USD.
10	Alpha Bank S.A. v The "Sea Urchin": Application for Direct Judicial Sale of Vessel 06 Feb 2014 Swissmarine Services S.A. (Other)Neutral	06 Feb 2014	Swissmarine Services S.A. (Other): NeutralSwissmarine supported the Bank's application, which was ultimately dismissed.
11	Kreuz Shipbuilding v The "Rainbow Star": Ship Repair, Negligence & Damages Assessment 16 Feb 2011 The "Rainbow Star" (Defendant, Respondent)Won	16 Feb 2011	The "Rainbow Star" (Defendant, Respondent): Counterclaim AllowedCounterclaim allowed. The judgment does not specify a currency, assuming SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	Chin Siew Seng v Quah Hun Kok Francis: Breach of Director's Duties and Share Valuation Dispute 30 Nov 2010 Chin Siew Seng (Appellant, Defendant)Partial	30 Nov 2010	Chin Siew Seng (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; Chin is liable to Seaspan Agencies for the sum of $113,120.62 for the address commissions paid out to Martin. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	Subiaco v Baker Hughes: Interpretation of 'Free In Stowed' Term in Shipping Contract 01 Sep 2010 Baker Hughes Singapore Pte (trading as Baker Hughes Inteq) (Defendant)Won	01 Sep 2010	Baker Hughes Singapore Pte (trading as Baker Hughes Inteq) (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of Baker Hughes; Subiaco's claim dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
14	OCBC Capital Investment Asia Ltd v Wong Hua Choon: Forum Non Conveniens & Stay of Proceedings 03 Aug 2010 Wong Hua Choon (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	03 Aug 2010	Wong Hua Choon (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe defendant's appeal for a stay of proceedings in favour of the Malaysian courts was dismissed.
15	Seaspan Agencies v Chin Siew Seng: Director's Duties & Breach in Ship-Brokering Business 01 Feb 2010 Chin Siew Seng (Defendant, Plaintiff)Lost	01 Feb 2010	Chin Siew Seng (Defendant, Plaintiff): Judgment against DefendantInterlocutory judgment against Chin for breach of director's duties. Damages to be assessed. Final judgment against Chin in the sum of $353,501.95 for Address Commissions paid out to Martin Charles. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
16	International Connex Holdings v Chan Shing On: Breach of Directors' Duties in Joint Venture 30 Dec 2007 International Connex Holdings Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	30 Dec 2007	International Connex Holdings Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claims DismissedPlaintiff's claims were dismissed, except for the order for the first defendant to provide financial reports. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	Abdul Razak Valibhoy v Keppel Investment Management Ltd: Breach of Contract and Fiduciary Duty in Investment Management 10 Oct 2002 Abdul Razak Valibhoy (Plaintiff)Lost	10 Oct 2002	Abdul Razak Valibhoy (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's action is dismissed with costs.