K Muralithrapany

K Muralithrapany is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2002. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and contract law.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

K Muralithrapany has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in admiralty and maritime law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	K Muralithrapany has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	K Muralithrapany has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	K Muralithrapany has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Frustration	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	K Muralithrapany has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	K Muralithrapany has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	K Muralithrapany has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	K Muralithrapany has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods Act	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	K Muralithrapany has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

K Muralithrapany has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Gabriel Peter & Partners	1 cases	100% of cases	Adani Wilmar v Rabobank: Dispute over Rapeseed Oil Sale & Enforceability of Contract(Jun 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of K Muralithrapany's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Withdrawn	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of K Muralithrapany's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Withdrawn	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Withdrawn: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Adani Wilmar v Rabobank: Dispute over Rapeseed Oil Sale & Enforceability of Contract 14 Jun 2002 Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank BA ("Rabobank Nederland") (Defendant)Withdrawn	14 Jun 2002	Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank BA ("Rabobank Nederland") (Defendant): Counterclaim WithdrawnThe counterclaim was withdrawn in the course of the trial subject to the bank paying costs in the counterclaim up to the time of withdrawal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.