K Nadarajan

K Nadarajan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2009. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and contract law. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

K Nadarajan has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and fiduciary duties.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	K Nadarajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	K Nadarajan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	K Nadarajan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	K Nadarajan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	K Nadarajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	K Nadarajan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contracts	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	K Nadarajan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Music Publishing	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	K Nadarajan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Royalties	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	K Nadarajan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

K Nadarajan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Aequitas Law LLP	1 cases	100% of cases	Chua Chian Ya v Music & Movements: Copyright Ownership Dispute over Compositions(Mar 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of K Nadarajan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of K Nadarajan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Chua Chian Ya v Music & Movements: Copyright Ownership Dispute over Compositions 30 Mar 2009 Music & Movements (S) Pte Ltd (formerly known as M & M Music Publishing) (Defendant)Won	30 Mar 2009	Music & Movements (S) Pte Ltd (formerly known as M & M Music Publishing) (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court ruled in favor of the defendant and ordered the plaintiff to pay costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).