K Nair Chandra Mohan

K Nair Chandra Mohan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in bankruptcy and recognition of foreign judgments. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

K Nair Chandra Mohan has demonstrated expertise across 16 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and bankruptcy.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	K Nair Chandra Mohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	K Nair Chandra Mohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Cross-Border Insolvency	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	K Nair Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	K Nair Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Recognition of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	K Nair Chandra Mohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	K Nair Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	K Nair Chandra Mohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	K Nair Chandra Mohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misappropriation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	K Nair Chandra Mohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	K Nair Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	K Nair Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	K Nair Chandra Mohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	K Nair Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	K Nair Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	K Nair Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Trust	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	K Nair Chandra Mohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

K Nair Chandra Mohan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Rajah & Cheah LLP	1 cases	50% of cases	O’Laughlin Industries v Tan Thiam Hock: Conspiracy, Breach of Trust, and Misuse of Company Goods(Feb 2021)
Tan Rajah & Cheah	1 cases	50% of cases	Heince Tombak Simanjuntak v Paulus Tannos: Recognition of Indonesian Bankruptcy Orders in Singapore(Sep 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of K Nair Chandra Mohan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 8.3
Complex Cases: 2 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	19.0 parties avg	9.0	50%
Lost	27.8 parties avg	7.8	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2021	19.0 parties avg	9.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of K Nair Chandra Mohan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(33%)	33%
Lost	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
USD	2,405,440.00	2,405,440.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Lost: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	O’Laughlin Industries v Tan Thiam Hock: Conspiracy, Breach of Trust, and Misuse of Company Goods 10 Feb 2021 Tan Huat Chye (Defendant)Dismissed	10 Feb 2021	Tan Huat Chye (Defendant): Claim DismissedPlaintiffs' claims against Huat Chye dismissed.
2	Heince Tombak Simanjuntak v Paulus Tannos: Recognition of Indonesian Bankruptcy Orders in Singapore 17 Sep 2019 Catherine Tannos (Respondent)Lost	17 Sep 2019	Catherine Tannos (Respondent): Application dismissedRespondents' application for setting aside the recognition order was dismissed.