K P Allagarsamy

K P Allagarsamy is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and negligence. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

K P Allagarsamy has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in construction law and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Construction Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	K P Allagarsamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	K P Allagarsamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	K P Allagarsamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	K P Allagarsamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	K P Allagarsamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	K P Allagarsamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	K P Allagarsamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	K P Allagarsamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	K P Allagarsamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	K P Allagarsamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	K P Allagarsamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	K P Allagarsamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Occupiers' Liability	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	K P Allagarsamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Lifeguard Negligence	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	K P Allagarsamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Swimming Pool Safety	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	K P Allagarsamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

K P Allagarsamy has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allagarsamy & Co	2 cases	100% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Nimalan Ananda Jothi: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Apr 2018) BNM v National University of Singapore: Negligence, Drowning, and Duty of Care(Jan 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of K P Allagarsamy's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of K P Allagarsamy's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v Nimalan Ananda Jothi: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 23 Apr 2018 Nimalan Ananda Jothi (Defendant)Lost	23 Apr 2018	Nimalan Ananda Jothi (Defendant): Sentence of 26 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the caneNimalan was sentenced to 26 years’ imprisonment and the mandatory 15 strokes of the cane for trafficking in not less than 14.99 grams of diamorphine.
2	BNM v National University of Singapore: Negligence, Drowning, and Duty of Care 08 Jan 2014 Hydro Aquatic Swimming School (Defendant)Won	08 Jan 2014	Hydro Aquatic Swimming School (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe claim against Hydro Aquatic Swimming School was dismissed as the court found that the negligence of the lifeguards did not cause the Deceased's death. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.