K Prasad

K Prasad is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2011 to 2013. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in misuse of drugs act and criminal law.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

K Prasad has demonstrated expertise across 11 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal procedure and misuse of drugs act.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	K Prasad has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	K Prasad has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	K Prasad has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	K Prasad has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	K Prasad has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	K Prasad has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Illegal importation of controlled drugs	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	K Prasad has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	K Prasad has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	K Prasad has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	K Prasad has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	K Prasad has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

K Prasad has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
K Prasad & Co	2 cases	100% of cases	PP v Abdul Haleem & Muhammad Ridzuan: Trafficking in Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act(May 2013) PP v Mas Swan: Drug Importation, Wilful Blindness & Presumptions under Misuse of Drugs Act(Apr 2011)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of K Prasad's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2011	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of K Prasad's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Partial	1(50%)	50%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Abdul Haleem & Muhammad Ridzuan: Trafficking in Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act 19 May 2013 Abdul Haleem bin Abdul Karim (Defendant)Partial	19 May 2013	Abdul Haleem bin Abdul Karim (Defendant): PartialConvicted on both charges; sentenced to life imprisonment and caning for the first charge, and imprisonment and caning for the second charge.
2	PP v Mas Swan: Drug Importation, Wilful Blindness & Presumptions under Misuse of Drugs Act 28 Apr 2011 Roshamima binti Roslan (Defendant)Lost	28 Apr 2011	Roshamima binti Roslan (Defendant): GuiltyConvicted under Section 7 of the Misuse of Drugs Act; mandatory death sentence pronounced.