K R Manickavasagam

K R Manickavasagam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2005 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and divorce.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

K R Manickavasagam has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	K R Manickavasagam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	K R Manickavasagam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	K R Manickavasagam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	K R Manickavasagam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	K R Manickavasagam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Home	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	K R Manickavasagam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	K R Manickavasagam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	K R Manickavasagam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Wife)	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	K R Manickavasagam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	K R Manickavasagam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	K R Manickavasagam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	K R Manickavasagam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	K R Manickavasagam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	K R Manickavasagam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets Division	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	K R Manickavasagam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Indirect contributions ratio	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	K R Manickavasagam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Financial resources	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	K R Manickavasagam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Earning capacity	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	K R Manickavasagam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Financial contribution	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	K R Manickavasagam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Abetment by conspiracy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	K R Manickavasagam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Leasing	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	K R Manickavasagam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Abetment by Aiding	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	K R Manickavasagam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

K R Manickavasagam has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Manicka & Co	2 cases	67% of cases	Panpac Education v Applied Movers: Sub-Lease Extension, Rental Obligations & Reinstatement Costs Dispute(Mar 2014) Ho Shin Hwee v Kwik Mak Seng Mark: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Wife's Maintenance(Oct 2013)
T U Naidu and Co	1 cases	33% of cases	Hwa Lai Heng Ricky v PP: Abetment, Cheating & Amendment of Charges(Oct 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of K R Manickavasagam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of K R Manickavasagam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Partial	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Panpac Education v Applied Movers: Sub-Lease Extension, Rental Obligations & Reinstatement Costs Dispute 19 Mar 2014 Applied Movers & Trading Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Partial	19 Mar 2014	Applied Movers & Trading Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal dismissed in part and allowed in partAppeal against the AR’s decision in respect of the sum of $214,856 was dismissed in part and allowed in part. The defendant was granted unconditional leave to defend the claim for reinstatement costs but upheld the AR’s order of conditional leave for the balance of rent unpaid (this amounted to $152,154). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Ho Shin Hwee v Kwik Mak Seng Mark: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Wife's Maintenance 21 Oct 2013 Kwik Mak Seng Mark (Defendant)Partial	21 Oct 2013	Kwik Mak Seng Mark (Defendant): PartialReceived 53% of net sale proceeds of matrimonial flat and ordered to pay S$54,000 lump sum maintenance to wife (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Hwa Lai Heng Ricky v PP: Abetment, Cheating & Amendment of Charges 13 Oct 2005 Hwa Lai Heng Ricky (Appellant)Lost	13 Oct 2005	Hwa Lai Heng Ricky (Appellant): Appeal against conviction dismissedAppeal against conviction dismissed after amendment of charge to abetment by intentional aiding.