K Subramanian

K Subramanian is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in automobile accidents and employment law.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

K Subramanian has demonstrated expertise across 12 primary practice areas, with significant experience in automobile accidents and employment law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	K Subramanian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	K Subramanian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	K Subramanian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	K Subramanian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	K Subramanian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	K Subramanian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	K Subramanian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	K Subramanian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	K Subramanian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	K Subramanian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Hearsay	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	K Subramanian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Wage Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	K Subramanian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

K Subramanian has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Hoh Law Corporation	2 cases	100% of cases	Xuyi Building Engineering Co v Li Aidong: Employee Claims for Unpaid Wages and Overtime(Aug 2010) Chua Kee Lam v Moksha: Negligence, Road Accidents, and Admissibility of Evidence(May 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of K Subramanian's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	23.0 parties avg	3.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2010	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of K Subramanian's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Xuyi Building Engineering Co v Li Aidong: Employee Claims for Unpaid Wages and Overtime 16 Aug 2010 Li Aidong (Respondent, Appellant)Partial	16 Aug 2010	Li Aidong (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal dismissed in part and allowed in partThe court found that the employees' payment system was time-based, entitling them to additional payments, but also ruled that Xuyi's failure to comply with the Employment Act allowed the employees to terminate their employment without notice. The court ordered payments to be computed at a rate of $2.50 per hour. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Chua Kee Lam v Moksha: Negligence, Road Accidents, and Admissibility of Evidence 05 May 2009 Chua Kee Lam (next friend to Chua Peck Seng) (Appellant)Partial	05 May 2009	Chua Kee Lam (next friend to Chua Peck Seng) (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part; liability apportioned with two-thirds to the appellant. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.