Kabir Singh

Kabir Singh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 11 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil procedure and arbitration. Their track record shows a 45.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 45% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kabir Singh has demonstrated expertise across 54 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	7 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	5 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Apparent bias	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Care	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Advice Privilege	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Share Subscription Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Material non-disclosure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation Privilege	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Setting aside application	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Customer-Banker Relationship	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cross-examination	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Foreign Exchange Transactions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Protection	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Case Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assignment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Kabir Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kabir Singh has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew and Napier LLC	5 cases	45% of cases	Sumitomo v Salim: Applications to Adduce Further Evidence and File Single Case at Substantive Appeals(Sep 2004) OCM Opportunities Fund II v Burhan Uray: Mareva Injunction, Asset Disclosure, Cross-Examination(Aug 2004) Wee Soon Kim Anthony v UBS AG: Appeal on Misrepresentation & Duty of Care in Foreign Exchange Transactions(Jul 2004)
Drew & Napier LLC	2 cases	18% of cases	Wee Soon Kim Anthony v UBS AG: Setting Aside Statutory Demand for Unpaid Costs(Aug 2006) Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken v Asia Pacific Breweries: Legal Advice & Litigation Privilege in Fraud Investigation(May 2006)
Cavenagh Law LLP	2 cases	18% of cases	BYL v BYN: Setting Aside Application Costs in ICC Arbitration(May 2020) BYL v BYN: Setting Aside of ICC Partial Award Due to Put Option Reliefs and Arbitrator Bias(Mar 2020)
Clifford Chance LLP	1 cases	9% of cases	DJA v DJB: Case Management Stay & Arbitration - Setting Aside Arbitral Award(Sep 2024)
Drew and Napier	1 cases	9% of cases	OCM Opportunities Fund II v Burhan Uray: Conspiracy, Fraud & Mareva Injunction(May 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kabir Singh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 11.1
Complex Cases: 5 (45%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.8 parties avg	2.8	27%
Neutral	218.0 parties avg	18.0	18%
Partial	118.0 parties avg	18.0	9%
Won	54.4 parties avg	4.4	45%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	516.2 parties avg	16.2
2006	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2020	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kabir Singh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(27%)	27%
Neutral	2(18%)	18%
Partial	1(9%)	9%
Won	5(45%)	45%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	167,000.00	33,400.005 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	5 212	Neutral: 2 cases (40.0%) Partial: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 2 cases (40.0%)
2006	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 11 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	DJA v DJB: Case Management Stay & Arbitration - Setting Aside Arbitral Award 01 Sep 2024 DJB (Defendant)Lost	01 Sep 2024	DJB (Defendant): Application for Case Management Stay DeniedThe defendant's opposition to the claimant's application for a case management stay was unsuccessful.
2	BYL v BYN: Setting Aside Application Costs in ICC Arbitration 10 May 2020 BYM (Plaintiff)Lost	10 May 2020	BYM (Plaintiff): Costs to be paid to DefendantPlaintiffs are to pay the Defendant's costs of S$82,500. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	BYL v BYN: Setting Aside of ICC Partial Award Due to Put Option Reliefs and Arbitrator Bias 02 Mar 2020 BYM (Plaintiff)Lost	02 Mar 2020	BYM (Plaintiff): Application dismissedThe Plaintiffs' application to set aside the ICC Award was dismissed.
4	Wee Soon Kim Anthony v UBS AG: Setting Aside Statutory Demand for Unpaid Costs 01 Aug 2006 UBS AG (Respondent)Won	01 Aug 2006	UBS AG (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs fixed at $2,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken v Asia Pacific Breweries: Legal Advice & Litigation Privilege in Fraud Investigation 30 May 2006 Asia Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Won	30 May 2006	Asia Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal AllowedAPBS's appeal against the order to produce the PWC Draft Reports was allowed.
6	Sumitomo v Salim: Applications to Adduce Further Evidence and File Single Case at Substantive Appeals 02 Sep 2004 Salim Anthony (Respondent, Defendant)Neutral	02 Sep 2004	Salim Anthony (Respondent, Defendant): Application adjournedThe court ruled that it had no jurisdiction to hear the applications for the adduction of fresh evidence and directed that they be adjourned to be heard before the full Court of Appeal.
7	OCM Opportunities Fund II v Burhan Uray: Mareva Injunction, Asset Disclosure, Cross-Examination 05 Aug 2004 ASO I (Delaware) LLC (Plaintiff)Partial	05 Aug 2004	ASO I (Delaware) LLC (Plaintiff): Application allowed in partApplication for cross-examination allowed for most defendants.
8	Wee Soon Kim Anthony v UBS AG: Appeal on Misrepresentation & Duty of Care in Foreign Exchange Transactions 28 Jul 2004 UBS AG (Respondent)Won	28 Jul 2004	UBS AG (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in favor of UBS AG, with costs awarded to UBS AG.
9	Salim Anthony v Sumitomo: Assignment of Creditors' Rights & Guarantee Discharge 03 Jun 2004 Salim Anthony (Plaintiff)Won	03 Jun 2004	Salim Anthony (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; the court declared the assignment invalid and affirmed the plaintiff's discharge of obligations under the guarantee, entitling him to subrogation rights. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	OCM Opportunities Fund II v Burhan Uray: Conspiracy, Fraud & Mareva Injunction 31 May 2004 ASO I (Delaware) LLC (Plaintiff)Neutral	31 May 2004	ASO I (Delaware) LLC (Plaintiff): Application to strike out claim dismissedApplication to strike out claim dismissed.
11	Wee Soon Kim Anthony v UBS AG: Misrepresentation in Foreign Exchange Transactions and Banker's Duty of Care 07 Dec 2003 UBS AG (Defendant)Won	07 Dec 2003	UBS AG (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant; plaintiff's claim dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.