Kalaiselvi d/o Singaram

Kalaiselvi d/o Singaram is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and franchises and franchising. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kalaiselvi d/o Singaram has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in patents and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Patents	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kalaiselvi d/o Singaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Kalaiselvi d/o Singaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kalaiselvi d/o Singaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kalaiselvi d/o Singaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kalaiselvi d/o Singaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Franchises and Franchising	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kalaiselvi d/o Singaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kalaiselvi d/o Singaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kalaiselvi d/o Singaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Amendment of Pleadings	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kalaiselvi d/o Singaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kalaiselvi d/o Singaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kalaiselvi d/o Singaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kalaiselvi d/o Singaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kalaiselvi d/o Singaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Force Majeure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kalaiselvi d/o Singaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kalaiselvi d/o Singaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kalaiselvi d/o Singaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kalaiselvi d/o Singaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kalaiselvi d/o Singaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Patent Infringement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kalaiselvi d/o Singaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kalaiselvi d/o Singaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Prior Art	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kalaiselvi d/o Singaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kalaiselvi d/o Singaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kalaiselvi d/o Singaram has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Infinitus Law Corporation	3 cases	75% of cases	D'Oz International v PSB Corp: Franchise Fee Refund Dispute Over Chinese Regulations(Mar 2010) Mariwu v Dextra: Admissibility of Fresh Evidence and 'Without Prejudice' Correspondence in Patent Infringement Case(Oct 2006) Dextra Asia v Mariwu Industrial: Patent Infringement, Amendment of Defence & Earth Closet Order(Apr 2005)
Yeo Wu & Thian	1 cases	25% of cases	Jurong Readymix Concrete v Kaki Bukit: Director's Authority & Fiduciary Duty in Guarantee Issuance(Aug 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kalaiselvi d/o Singaram's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.5 parties avg	2.5	50%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	25%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2005	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2006	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kalaiselvi d/o Singaram's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	610,270.91	203,423.643 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	D'Oz International v PSB Corp: Franchise Fee Refund Dispute Over Chinese Regulations 17 Mar 2010 PSB Corp Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Lost	17 Mar 2010	PSB Corp Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal DismissedPSB's appeal was dismissed with costs to D'Oz. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Mariwu v Dextra: Admissibility of Fresh Evidence and 'Without Prejudice' Correspondence in Patent Infringement Case 09 Oct 2006 Mariwu Industrial Co (S) Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	09 Oct 2006	Mariwu Industrial Co (S) Pte Ltd (Appellant): Application AllowedApplication to adduce new evidence was allowed, and the case was remitted to the trial judge.
3	Dextra Asia v Mariwu Industrial: Patent Infringement, Amendment of Defence & Earth Closet Order 27 Apr 2005 Mariwu Industrial Co (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	27 Apr 2005	Mariwu Industrial Co (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Amendment of Defence AllowedApplication to re-amend their amended defence to include further instances of prior art was granted. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Jurong Readymix Concrete v Kaki Bukit: Director's Authority & Fiduciary Duty in Guarantee Issuance 25 Aug 2000 Kaki Bukit Industrial Park Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	25 Aug 2000	Kaki Bukit Industrial Park Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedJudgment against the defendants for the sum of $610,270.91 with the usual interest of 6% per annum from the date of this judgment to payment (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).