Kalaiselvi Singaram

Kalaiselvi Singaram is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2007. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in patents and patent infringement. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kalaiselvi Singaram has demonstrated expertise across 18 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and patents.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Kalaiselvi Singaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Patents	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kalaiselvi Singaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Patent Infringement	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Kalaiselvi Singaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Kalaiselvi Singaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kalaiselvi Singaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kalaiselvi Singaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kalaiselvi Singaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Quistclose trust	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kalaiselvi Singaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Repudiatory breach	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kalaiselvi Singaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Patent Validity	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kalaiselvi Singaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Novelty	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kalaiselvi Singaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Inventive step	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kalaiselvi Singaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Prior Art	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kalaiselvi Singaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Groundless threat of infringement	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kalaiselvi Singaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kalaiselvi Singaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Revocation of patent	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kalaiselvi Singaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kalaiselvi Singaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kalaiselvi Singaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kalaiselvi Singaram has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Infinitus Law Corporation	3 cases	100% of cases	Dextra Asia v Mariwu: Patent Infringement & Novelty of Bartec Concrete Reinforcement Process(Apr 2007) Dextra v Mariwu: Patent Infringement & Validity - Novelty & Inventiveness in Rebar Manufacturing(Jan 2006) Pacific Rim Palm Oil v PT Asiatic Persada: Breach of Loan Agreement & Quistclose Trust(Oct 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kalaiselvi Singaram's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	35.0 parties avg	5.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2006	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2007	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kalaiselvi Singaram's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
USD	20,000,000.00	20,000,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Dextra Asia v Mariwu: Patent Infringement & Novelty of Bartec Concrete Reinforcement Process 11 Apr 2007 Mariwu Industrial Co (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	11 Apr 2007	Mariwu Industrial Co (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe defendant's claim that the patent was invalid was dismissed.
2	Dextra v Mariwu: Patent Infringement & Validity - Novelty & Inventiveness in Rebar Manufacturing 26 Jan 2006 Mariwu Industrial Co (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	26 Jan 2006	Mariwu Industrial Co (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment AgainstJudgment against the Defendant; an injunction is granted to restrain Mariwu from infringing the patent, and there will be an inquiry as to the damages suffered by Dextra as a result of the infringement. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Pacific Rim Palm Oil v PT Asiatic Persada: Breach of Loan Agreement & Quistclose Trust 16 Oct 2003 Veronica Untu (Defendant)Lost	16 Oct 2003	Veronica Untu (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantThe court declared that the US$5 million in the Citibank account is held on trust for the Plaintiffs and ordered the 2nd and 3rd Defendants to pay the US$5 million to the Plaintiffs. Interest at 6% per annum was also awarded from the date of the writ of summons until the date of payment.