Kalyani Rajendran

Kalyani Rajendran is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2003. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in bankruptcy and insolvency law. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kalyani Rajendran has demonstrated expertise across 12 primary practice areas, with significant experience in bankruptcy and commercial leasing.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Bankruptcy	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kalyani Rajendran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Commercial Leasing	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kalyani Rajendran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kalyani Rajendran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kalyani Rajendran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Frustration	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kalyani Rajendran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kalyani Rajendran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kalyani Rajendran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kalyani Rajendran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kalyani Rajendran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kalyani Rajendran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kalyani Rajendran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Translation Service Business	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Kalyani Rajendran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kalyani Rajendran has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Wee Tay & Lim	2 cases	67% of cases	HDB v Microform: Frustration of Contract Due to Lack of Access to Leased Land(Sep 2003) Wong Kwei Cheong v ABN-AMRO Bank: Substituted Service & Setting Aside Statutory Demand(May 2002)
Drew & Napier	1 cases	33% of cases	Pai Lily v Yeo Peng Hock Henry: Medical Negligence, Limitation Act, and Causation in Eye Infection Case(Mar 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kalyani Rajendran's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	32.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kalyani Rajendran's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	3(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	HDB v Microform: Frustration of Contract Due to Lack of Access to Leased Land 21 Sep 2003 Housing & Development Board (a body incorporated under the Housing & Development Act) (Plaintiff)Won	21 Sep 2003	Housing & Development Board (a body incorporated under the Housing & Development Act) (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff, except prayers 4 and 5 of the statement of claim. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Wong Kwei Cheong v ABN-AMRO Bank: Substituted Service & Setting Aside Statutory Demand 21 May 2002 Wong Kwei Cheong (Appellant, Respondent)Won	21 May 2002	Wong Kwei Cheong (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal AllowedThe court upheld the AR’s decision to set aside the Statutory Demand and dismissed the Bank’s appeal with costs.
3	Pai Lily v Yeo Peng Hock Henry: Medical Negligence, Limitation Act, and Causation in Eye Infection Case 25 Mar 2001 Pai Lily (Plaintiff)Won	25 Mar 2001	Pai Lily (Plaintiff): Claim AllowedClaim allowed; damages to be assessed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.