Kan Shuk Weng

Kan Shuk Weng is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2012. The lawyer has handled 25 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and sentencing. Their track record shows a 80.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 8% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated expertise across 73 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	24 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 24 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	18 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 18 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Offences	8 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	8 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	7 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized91% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	6 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	5 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice22% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	5 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Outrage of Modesty	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice8% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Principles	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rape	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Revenue Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Theft	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Falsification of Documents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Housebreaking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Robbery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Breach of Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Women’s Charter	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Human Trafficking Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating course of justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Consent of Public Prosecutor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Credibility of Witness	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory offence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Solicitor's duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Securities Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Forfeiture Order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Common Gaming Houses Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Foreign Worker Rights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Gratification	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Vandalism	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Money Exchange	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cash Back Arrangement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
False Claim	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wholesome Meat and Fish Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trafficking in controlled drugs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Possession of Drugs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unnatural Sex	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
White Collar Crime	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Guidelines	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Diminished Responsibility	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment of Foreign Manpower Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Customs Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Murder	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized99% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Kan Shuk Weng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kan Shuk Weng has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 14 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	14 cases	56% of cases	Chan Heng Kong v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Abetment, and Mens Rea(Mar 2012) Lee Chiang Theng v PP: Employer's Duty to Foreign Workers' Welfare & Timely Salary Payment(Nov 2011) Yu Peng Hsueh-Shu v Public Prosecutor: Copyright Infringement & Interpretation of 'Article' under Copyright Act(Aug 2011)
Deputy Public Prosecutor	8 cases	32% of cases	Loh Yun Xin v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Sentence for Drug Offences(Nov 2008) Tay Siew Gek Rachelgina Jasmine v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Imprisonment for Assault(Oct 2008) Hong Leong Finance Ltd v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Revision of Vehicle Forfeiture under Wholesome Meat and Fish Act(Sep 2004)
Deputy Public Prosecutors	2 cases	8% of cases	Shahary bin Sulaiman v Public Prosecutor: Misuse of Drugs Act & Presumptions of Trafficking and Possession(Sep 2004) Public Prosecutor v Khwan-On Nathaphon: Murder, Diminished Responsibility(Oct 2001)
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	4% of cases	Bachoo Mohan Singh v PP: Interpretation of Section 209 of the Penal Code and Solicitor's Role in Filing False Claims(Jan 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kan Shuk Weng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 2 (8%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	42.8 parties avg	2.8	16%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	4%
Won	202.2 parties avg	2.2	80%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2004	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2010	62.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2012	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kan Shuk Weng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(16%)	16%
Partial	1(4%)	4%
Won	20(80%)	80%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.006 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2001	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2008	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2009	3 12	Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2010	6 15	Lost: 1 cases (16.7%) Won: 5 cases (83.3%)
2011	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 25 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Chan Heng Kong v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Abetment, and Mens Rea 05 Mar 2012 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	05 Mar 2012	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the convictions of Chan Heng Kong and Sng Chun Heng.
2	Lee Chiang Theng v PP: Employer's Duty to Foreign Workers' Welfare & Timely Salary Payment 21 Nov 2011 Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Applicant)Won	21 Nov 2011	Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Applicant): Appeal DismissedSuccessfully defended the appeal against the sentence for salary charges.
3	Yu Peng Hsueh-Shu v Public Prosecutor: Copyright Infringement & Interpretation of 'Article' under Copyright Act 24 Aug 2011 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	24 Aug 2011	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the custodial sentence was dismissed.
4	Biplob Hossain Younus Akan v Public Prosecutor: Customs Act & Mens Rea 16 Feb 2011 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	16 Feb 2011	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal AllowedConvictions and sentences set aside.
5	PP v Chow Yee Sze: Sentencing Appeal for Outrage of Modesty under Penal Code s 354 29 Aug 2010 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	29 Aug 2010	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed, and the sentences imposed by the District Judge were increased.
6	Fricker Oliver v Public Prosecutor: Vandalism Act & Protected Areas Offences 17 Aug 2010 Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant, Applicant)Won	17 Aug 2010	Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant, Applicant): Appeal AllowedThe Prosecution's appeal to increase the sentence was allowed.
7	Zhou Tong v Public Prosecutor: Gaming Offenses & Solicitor's Duty 14 Jul 2010 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	14 Jul 2010	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the original sentence against appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Luyono Lam v PP: Cash Movement Offences & Anti-Money Laundering Act 23 May 2010 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	23 May 2010	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was dismissed and the initial sentence was overturned.
9	Public Prosecutor v Mohamad Fadzly bin Din: Trafficking Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 19 Apr 2010 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	19 Apr 2010	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused was convicted as charged.
10	Bachoo Mohan Singh v PP: Interpretation of Section 209 of the Penal Code and Solicitor's Role in Filing False Claims 19 Jan 2010 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	19 Jan 2010	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Motion GrantedCriminal Motion No. 45 of 2009 granted.
11	Bachoo Mohan Singh v PP: False Claim, Solicitor's Duty, and Penal Code Interpretation 03 Dec 2009 Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Applicant)Partial	03 Dec 2009	Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Applicant): Extension of time granted to apply to the High Court Judge for leave to raise questions to the Court of AppealExtension of time granted to apply to the High Court Judge for leave to raise questions to the Court of Appeal.
12	Public Prosecutor v Gansean: Rape Conviction Upheld on Appeal 07 Jul 2009 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	07 Jul 2009	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Prosecution's appeal against the judge’s decision to convict the respondent for the offence of carnal connection under the Women’s Charter was allowed.
13	Bachoo Mohan Singh v PP: Abetting False Claim, Cash Back Scheme, Lawyer's Knowledge 24 May 2009 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	24 May 2009	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal against conviction upheldAppeal against conviction upheld.
14	Loh Yun Xin v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Sentence for Drug Offences 06 Nov 2008 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	06 Nov 2008	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application dismissedApplication for leave to appeal out of time was dismissed.
15	Tay Siew Gek Rachelgina Jasmine v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Imprisonment for Assault 19 Oct 2008 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	19 Oct 2008	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the original sentence of three months imprisonment was overturned (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
16	Hong Leong Finance Ltd v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Revision of Vehicle Forfeiture under Wholesome Meat and Fish Act 06 Sep 2004 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	06 Sep 2004	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Forfeiture order upheldThe court upheld the forfeiture order of the vehicle.
17	Shahary bin Sulaiman v Public Prosecutor: Misuse of Drugs Act & Presumptions of Trafficking and Possession 02 Sep 2004 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	02 Sep 2004	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the conviction was dismissed.
18	Mohd Arsad bin Hassan v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking in Diamorphine - Defence of Lack of Knowledge 22 Aug 2004 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	22 Aug 2004	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Conviction UpheldThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the conviction for trafficking in diamorphine.
19	Shapy Khan v PP: Criminal Breach of Trust & Securities Industry Act Violation 25 May 2003 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	25 May 2003	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment UpheldThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal, upholding the original conviction and sentence.
20	Public Prosecutor v Khwan-On Nathaphon: Murder, Diminished Responsibility 14 Oct 2001 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	14 Oct 2001	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe Public Prosecutor won the case against the accused.
21	Jingga bin Md Selamat v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Diamorphine and Knowledge of Drug Possession 29 Apr 2001 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	29 Apr 2001	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment UpheldThe Public Prosecutor's case was upheld; the appeal was dismissed.
22	Choo Pheng Soon v Public Prosecutor: Forgery, Fabricating False Evidence, and Criminal Procedure 21 Jan 2001 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	21 Jan 2001	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the conviction was dismissed, and the sentence was enhanced.
23	Public Prosecutor v Netto Michael George: Housebreaking, Rape, Unnatural Sex, Outraging Modesty, and Armed Robbery 29 Nov 2000 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	29 Nov 2000	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Guilty as chargedThe Accused was found guilty on all charges.
24	Fong Ser Joo William v PP: Corruption, Police Officer, Accepting Gratification 31 Aug 2000 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	31 Aug 2000	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal by Fong Ser Joo William was dismissed.
25	Kwan Peng Hong v PP: Outrage of Modesty, Criminal Force & Evidence in Sexual Offence Cases 10 Aug 2000 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	10 Aug 2000	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed, affirming the original conviction and sentence. No monetary amount was specified.