Kanan Ramesh

Kanan Ramesh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2003. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and garnishee proceedings. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kanan Ramesh has demonstrated expertise across 4 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil practice and garnishee proceedings.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Practice	1 cases	25% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kanan Ramesh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 25% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	25% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kanan Ramesh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 25% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	25% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kanan Ramesh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 25% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	25% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kanan Ramesh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 25% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kanan Ramesh has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	1 cases	100% of cases	American Express Bank v Abdul Manaff: Garnishment of Wages under SCJA(Oct 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kanan Ramesh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 1 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	15.0 parties avg	5.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kanan Ramesh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	American Express Bank v Abdul Manaff: Garnishment of Wages under SCJA 21 Oct 2003 United Overseas Bank Ltd (Appellant, Judgment Creditor)Lost	21 Oct 2003	United Overseas Bank Ltd (Appellant, Judgment Creditor): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; the court ruled that wages or salary is exempted from garnishment (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).