Kanesh Balasubramaniam

Kanesh Balasubramaniam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in eminent domain and land law. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kanesh Balasubramaniam has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and constitutional law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kanesh Balasubramaniam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kanesh Balasubramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kanesh Balasubramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Eminent Domain	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kanesh Balasubramaniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Housing Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kanesh Balasubramaniam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Land Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kanesh Balasubramaniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kanesh Balasubramaniam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kanesh Balasubramaniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kanesh Balasubramaniam has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	1 cases	100% of cases	Per Ah Seng Robin v HDB: Quashing Order Refused for HDB's Compulsory Acquisition of Flat Due to Illegal Subletting(Dec 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kanesh Balasubramaniam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 1 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kanesh Balasubramaniam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	15,000.00	15,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Per Ah Seng Robin v HDB: Quashing Order Refused for HDB's Compulsory Acquisition of Flat Due to Illegal Subletting 21 Dec 2014 Attorney-General’s Chambers (Respondent)Won	21 Dec 2014	Attorney-General’s Chambers (Respondent): Successful DefenceApplication for leave to file an application for a quashing order was dismissed. Applicants to pay costs of $15,000 to AGC. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.