Kang Hui Lin Jasmin

Kang Hui Lin Jasmin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in legal ethics and professional responsibility and insolvency law. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kang Hui Lin Jasmin has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and judgments and orders.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	5 cases	19% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kang Hui Lin Jasmin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 19% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kang Hui Lin Jasmin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kang Hui Lin Jasmin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Kang Hui Lin Jasmin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kang Hui Lin Jasmin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kang Hui Lin Jasmin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kang Hui Lin Jasmin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kang Hui Lin Jasmin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kang Hui Lin Jasmin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kang Hui Lin Jasmin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Apparent bias	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kang Hui Lin Jasmin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kang Hui Lin Jasmin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kang Hui Lin Jasmin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Recusal	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kang Hui Lin Jasmin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Private Prosecution	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kang Hui Lin Jasmin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Strata Management	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kang Hui Lin Jasmin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kang Hui Lin Jasmin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kang Hui Lin Jasmin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Kang Hui Lin Jasmin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kang Hui Lin Jasmin has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Aequitas Law LLP	4 cases	80% of cases	Raman Dhir v Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 1374: Appeal on Leave Requirement for Cross-Claim(Sep 2021) Dhir v Management Corp: Recusal Application Based on Alleged Bias in Property Dispute(Apr 2021) CBB v Law Society: Mandatory Order for Legal Profession Act Complaint(Jan 2021)
Kelvin Chia Partnership	1 cases	20% of cases	Ascentury International v Viva Capital: Termination of Winding Up Order(May 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kang Hui Lin Jasmin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	20%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Won	32.0 parties avg	2.0	60%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	42.4 parties avg	2.4
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kang Hui Lin Jasmin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20%)	20%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	3(60%)	60%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	12,000.00	3,000.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	4 112	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ascentury International v Viva Capital: Termination of Winding Up Order 06 May 2024 Ascentury International Company Limited (Claimant)Won	06 May 2024	Ascentury International Company Limited (Claimant): Application grantedApplication to terminate the winding up order was granted, conditional upon the liquidators' remuneration and disbursements being paid from Viva Capital's assets. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Raman Dhir v Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 1374: Appeal on Leave Requirement for Cross-Claim 15 Sep 2021 Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 1374 (Respondent)Won	15 Sep 2021	Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 1374 (Respondent): Appeal UpheldAppeal upheld; costs awarded to the respondent fixed at $5,000 plus disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Dhir v Management Corp: Recusal Application Based on Alleged Bias in Property Dispute 21 Apr 2021 Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 1374 (Respondent)Won	21 Apr 2021	Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 1374 (Respondent): Application DismissedThe application for recusal was dismissed.
4	CBB v Law Society: Mandatory Order for Legal Profession Act Complaint 28 Jan 2021 Law Society of Singapore (Respondent)Partial	28 Jan 2021	Law Society of Singapore (Respondent): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal dismissed in part; mandatory order granted. Liable for costs of the appeal awarded to the appellant, fixed at $10,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Cheung Phei Chiet v Cheong Yoke Ling: Application for Permanent Stay of Private Prosecution for Mischief 25 Jan 2021 Parameshwara s/o Krishnasamy (Applicant)Lost	25 Jan 2021	Parameshwara s/o Krishnasamy (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication for a permanent stay of criminal proceedings was dismissed; costs of $3,500 awarded to the respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).