Kanthosamy Rajendran

Kanthosamy Rajendran is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 11 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in real estate and matrimonial assets. Their track record shows a 27.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 9% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated expertise across 62 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and property law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Property Law	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Child)	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Malicious Falsehood	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Tenancy Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Settlement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Licensing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Dangerous Driving	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Principles	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Payment Services Act 2019	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Money Transfer Services	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fintech	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Variation of Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale and Purchase Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Letter of Indemnity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Procedural Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Housing and Development Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Declaration of Invalidity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Deeds	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Forfeiture of Deposit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
HDB Resale	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Financial Services Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Traffic Violations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unfair Competition	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Access to Children	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Home	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kanthosamy Rajendran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kanthosamy Rajendran has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
RLC Law Corporation	7 cases	64% of cases	Nalli Pte Ltd v Nalli Kuppuswami Chetti: Trademark, Passing Off & Contract Dispute(May 2024) La Comida Buds Bar & Bistro Pte Ltd v Layan Management Pte Ltd: Security for Costs Application(Mar 2024) Ma Zhen Hu Michael v Public Prosecutor: Dangerous Driving and Disqualification Order(Sep 2023)
Relianze Law Corporation	3 cases	27% of cases	Lim Zhipeng v Seow Suat Thin: Appeal Against Summary Judgment Based on Deed of Guarantee(Apr 2019) TRS v TRT: Appeal on Child Access, Maintenance, and Matrimonial Asset Division(Feb 2017) Goh Liang Yong Jonah v Heng Kuek Hoy: Forfeiture of Deposits and Rental Payments in Property Sale Dispute(Oct 2013)
Raj Prasanna & Partners	1 cases	9% of cases	Muharrem Unsal v M K Sivalingam Jaganathan: Specific Performance of HDB Flat Sale Agreement Dispute(Aug 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kanthosamy Rajendran's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 1 (9%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	72.4 parties avg	2.4	64%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	9%
Won	34.8 parties avg	4.8	27%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	25.8 parties avg	5.8

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kanthosamy Rajendran's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	7(64%)	64%
Partial	1(9%)	9%
Won	3(27%)	27%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	328,000.00	54,666.676 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)
2024	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 11 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Nalli Pte Ltd v Nalli Kuppuswami Chetti: Trademark, Passing Off & Contract Dispute 26 May 2024 Alluri Mahalakshmi Madhavan (Appellant, Defendant)Won	26 May 2024	Alluri Mahalakshmi Madhavan (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; injunctions set aside; costs of $200,000 at trial and $40,000 for the appeal awarded to the appellant. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	La Comida Buds Bar & Bistro Pte Ltd v Layan Management Pte Ltd: Security for Costs Application 13 Mar 2024 Layan Management Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	13 Mar 2024	Layan Management Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal against the dismissal of its application for security of costs was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Ma Zhen Hu Michael v Public Prosecutor: Dangerous Driving and Disqualification Order 06 Sep 2023 Michael Ma Zhen Hu (Appellant)Lost	06 Sep 2023	Michael Ma Zhen Hu (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against the disqualification order was dismissed.
4	Vijay Kumar v Public Prosecutor: Unlicensed Money Transfer Services & Sentencing Framework under Payment Services Act 20 Apr 2023 Vijay Kumar (Appellant)Lost	20 Apr 2023	Vijay Kumar (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the sentence of two weeks’ imprisonment was dismissed.
5	WJW v WJX: Appeal on Division of Matrimonial Assets After Divorce 11 Apr 2023 WJW (Appellant)Partial	11 Apr 2023	WJW (Appellant): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal dismissed, but original order amended to compel the wife to buy out the husband's share of the matrimonial home at current valuation (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	All India Supermart v Indian Supermarket: Trade Mark Infringement & Passing Off 30 Dec 2021 Duraikkannu Baskaran (Defendant, Respondent)Won	30 Dec 2021	Duraikkannu Baskaran (Defendant, Respondent): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant on all claims.
7	Lim Zhipeng v Seow Suat Thin: Guarantee Enforceability & Consideration in Debt Recovery 07 Sep 2020 Seow Suat Thin (Respondent)Lost	07 Sep 2020	Seow Suat Thin (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; judgment entered against the Respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Lim Zhipeng v Seow Suat Thin: Appeal Against Summary Judgment Based on Deed of Guarantee 23 Apr 2019 Seow Suat Thin (Defendant, Appellant)Won	23 Apr 2019	Seow Suat Thin (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal was allowed and the order for summary judgment was set aside. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
9	TRS v TRT: Appeal on Child Access, Maintenance, and Matrimonial Asset Division 26 Feb 2017 TRS (Appellant)Lost	26 Feb 2017	TRS (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe Husband's appeal against the orders relating to access, maintenance, and division of matrimonial assets was dismissed.
10	Goh Liang Yong Jonah v Heng Kuek Hoy: Forfeiture of Deposits and Rental Payments in Property Sale Dispute 02 Oct 2013 Heng Kuek Hoy (Defendant)Lost	02 Oct 2013	Heng Kuek Hoy (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe court ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff rental in the sum of $88,000 pursuant to clause 5.1 of the Letter of Indemnity. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	Muharrem Unsal v M K Sivalingam Jaganathan: Specific Performance of HDB Flat Sale Agreement Dispute 17 Aug 2010 Thangaveloo Thenmolee (Defendant)Lost	17 Aug 2010	Thangaveloo Thenmolee (Defendant): Claim DismissedSummary judgment granted against the Defendant. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.