Karen Ang

Karen Ang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2007 to 2008. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Karen Ang has demonstrated expertise across 7 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and theft.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	2 cases	25% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Karen Ang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 25% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Karen Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Karen Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Karen Ang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Karen Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Murder	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Karen Ang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Karen Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Karen Ang has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Deputy Public Prosecutors	1 cases	50% of cases	PP v Kamal Bin Kupli: Murder, Common Intention, and Penal Code Interpretation(Jun 2007)
Deputy Public Prosecutor	1 cases	50% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Lee Kwee Siong: Drug Trafficking & Knowledge of Controlled Drugs(Jul 2008)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Karen Ang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	23.5 parties avg	3.5	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2008	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Karen Ang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	2(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v Lee Kwee Siong: Drug Trafficking & Knowledge of Controlled Drugs 20 Jul 2008 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	20 Jul 2008	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): ConvictionThe Public Prosecutor won the case, leading to the conviction of both accused.
2	PP v Kamal Bin Kupli: Murder, Common Intention, and Penal Code Interpretation 26 Jun 2007 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	26 Jun 2007	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAll three accused persons were found guilty on the charge they faced, convicted them, and imposed the mandatory death sentence on them.