Karol Goh

Karol Goh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2003. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in copyrights and patents. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Karol Goh has demonstrated expertise across 4 primary practice areas, with significant experience in appellate litigation and copyrights.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Appellate Litigation	1 cases	25% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Karol Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 25% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	25% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Karol Goh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 25% of their total caseload.
Patents	1 cases	25% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Karol Goh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 25% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	25% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Karol Goh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 25% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Karol Goh has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Bih Li & Lee	1 cases	50% of cases	Performing Right Society v United Artists: Copyright Infringement of Musical Works in Films(Mar 2001)
Alban Kang Mahtani & de Silva	1 cases	50% of cases	Peng Lian Trading Co v Contour Optik Inc: Patent Infringement & Inventive Step in Spectacle Frames(Jun 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Karol Goh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	23.3 parties avg	3.3	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2003	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Karol Goh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Peng Lian Trading Co v Contour Optik Inc: Patent Infringement & Inventive Step in Spectacle Frames 23 Jun 2003 Peng Lian Trading Co (Appellant)Partial	23 Jun 2003	Peng Lian Trading Co (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; claims 3 and 4 of patent 60169 are not patentable. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.
2	Performing Right Society v United Artists: Copyright Infringement of Musical Works in Films 21 Mar 2001 Composers and Authors Society of Singapore Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	21 Mar 2001	Composers and Authors Society of Singapore Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim allowed in partThe plaintiff's claim succeeded in respect of the Jerry Maguire Works but not in respect of the Titanic Works. United Artists are accountable to the plaintiffs for the public performance of the Jerry Maguire Works. The court ordered that United Artists pay two-thirds of the costs of the plaintiffs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.