Keith Valentine Lee Jia Jin

Keith Valentine Lee Jia Jin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in insolvency law and breach of confidence. Their track record shows a 43.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 57% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Keith Valentine Lee Jia Jin has demonstrated expertise across 34 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Keith Valentine Lee Jia Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	4 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Keith Valentine Lee Jia Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Keith Valentine Lee Jia Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Keith Valentine Lee Jia Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Keith Valentine Lee Jia Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Keith Valentine Lee Jia Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Keith Valentine Lee Jia Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Keith Valentine Lee Jia Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Keith Valentine Lee Jia Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Keith Valentine Lee Jia Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Keith Valentine Lee Jia Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Keith Valentine Lee Jia Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Keith Valentine Lee Jia Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Keith Valentine Lee Jia Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Legal Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Keith Valentine Lee Jia Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Interest	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Keith Valentine Lee Jia Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Keith Valentine Lee Jia Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Keith Valentine Lee Jia Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Keith Valentine Lee Jia Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Keith Valentine Lee Jia Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Keith Valentine Lee Jia Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Keith Valentine Lee Jia Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Keith Valentine Lee Jia Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Keith Valentine Lee Jia Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Singapore International Commercial Court Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Keith Valentine Lee Jia Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Keith Valentine Lee Jia Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Keith Valentine Lee Jia Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Keith Valentine Lee Jia Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Juvenile Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Keith Valentine Lee Jia Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Keith Valentine Lee Jia Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Keith Valentine Lee Jia Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Keith Valentine Lee Jia Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Keith Valentine Lee Jia Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Keith Valentine Lee Jia Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Keith Valentine Lee Jia Jin has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Advocatus Law LLP	7 cases	100% of cases	Seow Fook Sen Aloysius v Rajah & Tann: Guidance on Appeals under Supreme Court of Judicature Act(May 2022) Larpin v Nargolwala: Application for Indemnity Costs in SICC Dispute(Apr 2022) Hin Leong Trading v Rajah & Tann: Directors' Powers in Judicial Management(Apr 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Keith Valentine Lee Jia Jin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.4
Complex Cases: 4 (57%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	14%
Lost	33.8 parties avg	3.8	43%
Won	35.1 parties avg	5.1	43%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2022	54.3 parties avg	4.3

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Keith Valentine Lee Jia Jin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(14%)	14%
Lost	3(43%)	43%
Won	3(43%)	43%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	200,000.00	33,333.336 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	5 131	Dismissed: 1 cases (20.0%) Lost: 3 cases (60.0%) Won: 1 cases (20.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Seow Fook Sen Aloysius v Rajah & Tann: Guidance on Appeals under Supreme Court of Judicature Act 11 May 2022 Seow Fook Sen Aloysius (Applicant)Dismissed	11 May 2022	Seow Fook Sen Aloysius (Applicant): Application DismissedOriginating Summons dismissed for lack of jurisdiction; leave granted to file with the Appellate Division.
2	Larpin v Nargolwala: Application for Indemnity Costs in SICC Dispute 24 Apr 2022 Quo Vadis Investments Limited (Plaintiff)Lost	24 Apr 2022	Quo Vadis Investments Limited (Plaintiff): Application for indemnity costs refusedThe defendants' application for indemnity costs was refused, and the defendants must pay the plaintiffs’ costs which may be set off against the costs payable by the plaintiffs to the defendants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Hin Leong Trading v Rajah & Tann: Directors' Powers in Judicial Management 03 Apr 2022 Hin Leong Trading (Pte) Ltd (in liquidation) (Appellant, Applicant)Lost	03 Apr 2022	Hin Leong Trading (Pte) Ltd (in liquidation) (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of the appeal fixed at $40,000, inclusive of disbursements, to be paid by Mr CM Lim and Ms HC Lim personally. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Lim Oon Kuin v Rajah & Tann: Joinder, Breach of Confidence & Solicitor Conduct 03 Apr 2022 Lim Huey Ching (Appellant)Won	03 Apr 2022	Lim Huey Ching (Appellant): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed; Rajah & Tann to pay the Lims $40,000 inclusive of disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Larpin v Nargolwala: Rescission Claim for Villa Purchase Based on Misrepresentation 20 Feb 2022 Quo Vadis Investments Limited (Plaintiff)Lost	20 Feb 2022	Quo Vadis Investments Limited (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedClaim for rescission of agreements, return of purchase price, and damages was dismissed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Lew v Nargolwala: Agency, Contract Formation, Trusts & Conflict of Laws 09 Feb 2021 Christian Alfred Larpin (Respondent)Won	09 Feb 2021	Christian Alfred Larpin (Respondent): Claims DismissedClaims against Christian Alfred Larpin dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Ho Yu Tat v Chen Kok Siang: Striking Out & Bankrupt's Duty 21 Apr 2020 Joseph Chen & Co (Respondent, Defendant)Won	21 Apr 2020	Joseph Chen & Co (Respondent, Defendant): WonAppeal dismissed; appellant ordered to pay the respondents $20,000 in costs inclusive of disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).