Kelly Yap

Kelly Yap is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 13 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in admiralty and maritime law and civil practice. Their track record shows a 15.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 23% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kelly Yap has demonstrated expertise across 83 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	12 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 12 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	8 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	5 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Double Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Dividends	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ship Mortgage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shipping Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Variation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Non-compliance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale Pendente Lite	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Henderson v Henderson doctrine	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Marine Insurance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Adduction of Further Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unless Order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Letter of Indemnity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale of Property	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Lending and security	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
General Principles	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Law of Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inherent Power of the Court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assignments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admiralty Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Limitation Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Dangerous Goods	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ship-to-ship transfer operation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Marine Accidents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ship Repair Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arrest of Vessel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance Bad Faith	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kelly Yap has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kelly Yap has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Oon & Bazul LLP	7 cases	54% of cases	Major Shipping & Trading Inc v Standard Chartered Bank: Unauthorized Fund Transfers & Bank's Duty of Care(Jan 2018) JVL Agro Industries Ltd v Agritrade International Pte Ltd: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice(Jul 2016) Sandz Solutions v Strategic Worldwide: Dividends Dispute & Unwinding of Lexicon SPA(May 2014)
Rajah & Tann	4 cases	31% of cases	Bonito: Extension of Time for Filing Reference to Registrar for Damages Assessment(Apr 2001) The 'Bonito' v The 'Ah Lam II': Collision Claim & Extension of Time for Damages Assessment(Apr 2001) Pan-United Shipyard v India International Insurance: Scope of Insurance Policy for Ship Repairers' Liability(Sep 2000)
Rajah and Tann	2 cases	15% of cases	Sunrise Crane v Pristine: Negligence Claim for Damage from Contaminated Nitric Acid(Nov 2003) Hua Seng Sawmill v QBE Insurance: Marine Insurance, Insurable Interest & Washing Overboard(Oct 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kelly Yap's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.2
Complex Cases: 3 (23%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	17.0 parties avg	7.0	8%
Lost	82.1 parties avg	2.1	62%
Neutral	26.5 parties avg	6.5	15%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	15%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2003	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	24.5 parties avg	4.5
2014	26.5 parties avg	6.5
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kelly Yap's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(8%)	8%
Lost	8(62%)	62%
Neutral	2(15%)	15%
Won	2(15%)	15%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	384,375.00	48,046.888 cases	8
USD	1,016,219.68	1,016,219.681 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2001	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2003	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2014	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 13 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Major Shipping & Trading Inc v Standard Chartered Bank: Unauthorized Fund Transfers & Bank's Duty of Care 03 Jan 2018 Major Shipping & Trading Inc (Plaintiff)Lost	03 Jan 2018	Major Shipping & Trading Inc (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for US$1,838,720.51 was dismissed, and the plaintiff was ordered to pay costs of S$384,375 to the defendant on an indemnity basis (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	JVL Agro Industries Ltd v Agritrade International Pte Ltd: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice 12 Jul 2016 AGRITRADE INTERNATIONAL PTE LTD (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	12 Jul 2016	AGRITRADE INTERNATIONAL PTE LTD (Defendant, Respondent): Application DeniedAward set aside; Agritrade to pay JVL's costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Sandz Solutions v Strategic Worldwide: Dividends Dispute & Unwinding of Lexicon SPA 20 May 2014 Poon Seng Fatt (Respondent)Dismissed	20 May 2014	Poon Seng Fatt (Respondent): Counterclaim DismissedThe Judge’s decision dismissing the Appellants’ conspiracy counterclaim is upheld. We make no order as to the costs of the Appellants’ counterclaim. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Alpha Bank S.A. v The "Sea Urchin": Application for Direct Judicial Sale of Vessel 06 Feb 2014 Qingdao Bohi Agricultural Development Co Ltd (Intervener)Neutral	06 Feb 2014	Qingdao Bohi Agricultural Development Co Ltd (Intervener): NeutralThe Intervener supported the Bank's application, which was ultimately dismissed.
5	Strategic Worldwide Assets Ltd v Sandz Solutions: Dividend Claim & Conspiracy 25 Aug 2013 John Poon Seng Fatt (Third Party, Defendant)Neutral	25 Aug 2013	John Poon Seng Fatt (Third Party, Defendant): Claim DismissedDefendants shall also pay the costs of the third parties. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
6	Mitora Pte Ltd v Agritrade International: Striking Out of Statement of Claim for Breach of Unless Orders 02 Jul 2013 AGRITRADE INTERNATIONAL PTE LTD (Respondent)Lost	02 Jul 2013	AGRITRADE INTERNATIONAL PTE LTD (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with no order of costs. Cost orders below were not disturbed.
7	VVF Singapore v Nayak: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Unauthorized Transactions 20 Jun 2012 VVF Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	20 Jun 2012	VVF Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $963,265.91 for breach of employment contract and $52,953.77 for overdrawn salary (assumed USD, as the judgment involves a Singapore company trading in USD).
8	Sunrise Crane v Pristine: Negligence Claim for Damage from Contaminated Nitric Acid 25 Nov 2003 Doman Shipping SA (Defendant)Lost	25 Nov 2003	Doman Shipping SA (Defendant): Judgment Against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant with costs and for damages to be assessed by the Registrar. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Hua Seng Sawmill v QBE Insurance: Marine Insurance, Insurable Interest & Washing Overboard 08 Oct 2003 Hua Seng Sawmill Co Bhd (Plaintiff)Lost	08 Oct 2003	Hua Seng Sawmill Co Bhd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for indemnity under a marine cargo policy was dismissed.
10	Bonito: Extension of Time for Filing Reference to Registrar for Damages Assessment 25 Apr 2001 Bonito (Appellant)Lost	25 Apr 2001	Bonito (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
11	The 'Bonito' v The 'Ah Lam II': Collision Claim & Extension of Time for Damages Assessment 25 Apr 2001 The 'Bonito' (Appellant)Lost	25 Apr 2001	The 'Bonito' (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the decision to grant an extension of time for filing the reference to the registrar for assessment of damages was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
12	Pan-United Shipyard v India International Insurance: Scope of Insurance Policy for Ship Repairers' Liability 11 Sep 2000 India International Insurance Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	11 Sep 2000	India International Insurance Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs in favour of the respondent. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	Zarkovic Stanko v Owners of the Ship MARA: Admiralty Jurisdiction, Personal Injury, and Contractual Compensation 31 Aug 2000 Owners of the Ship or Vessel `MARA` (Respondent)Lost	31 Aug 2000	Owners of the Ship or Vessel `MARA` (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; required to pay the appellant under art 15 in addition to the US$420,000 settlement. Currency assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.