Kelvin Aw

Kelvin Aw is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in construction law and breach of contract. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kelvin Aw has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in construction law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Construction Law	2 cases	22% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kelvin Aw has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 22% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kelvin Aw has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kelvin Aw has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kelvin Aw has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kelvin Aw has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kelvin Aw has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Adjudication	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kelvin Aw has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Setting aside adjudication determination	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kelvin Aw has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kelvin Aw has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Morgan Lewis Stamford LLC	1 cases	50% of cases	Bintai Kindenko Pte Ltd v Samsung C&T Corp: Setting Aside Adjudication Determination for Building and Construction Dispute(Dec 2017)
Harry Elias Partnership	1 cases	50% of cases	Jia Chen Construction v. Wei Sin Construction: Subcontract Dispute over Payment and Omitted Works(Apr 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kelvin Aw's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kelvin Aw's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	33,000.00	16,500.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Bintai Kindenko Pte Ltd v Samsung C&T Corp: Setting Aside Adjudication Determination for Building and Construction Dispute 18 Dec 2017 Samsung C&T Corp (Respondent, Applicant)Won	18 Dec 2017	Samsung C&T Corp (Respondent, Applicant): Application AllowedSamsung's application to set aside the Adjudication Determination was allowed, with costs of $10,000 to be paid by Bintai to Samsung (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Jia Chen Construction v. Wei Sin Construction: Subcontract Dispute over Payment and Omitted Works 27 Apr 2000 Wei Sin Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	27 Apr 2000	Wei Sin Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim partially allowedCounterclaim allowed in part for defects (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).