Kelvin Koh

Kelvin Koh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in winding up and fiduciary duties. Their track record shows a 14.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 67% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kelvin Koh has demonstrated expertise across 36 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and trust law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	5 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Kelvin Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	4 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Kelvin Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Kelvin Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Kelvin Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kelvin Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kelvin Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kelvin Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Kelvin Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kelvin Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kelvin Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kelvin Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kelvin Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kelvin Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kelvin Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Kelvin Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kelvin Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kelvin Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kelvin Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kelvin Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kelvin Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kelvin Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kelvin Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kelvin Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Kelvin Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Accessory liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Kelvin Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Quistclose trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kelvin Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Joinder of Parties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kelvin Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Failure of Basis	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kelvin Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreements	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kelvin Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Kelvin Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Securities and Futures Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kelvin Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commodity Trading	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kelvin Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kelvin Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kelvin Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Formation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kelvin Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kelvin Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kelvin Koh has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
TSMP Law Corporation	6 cases	100% of cases	Liang Xihong v Loong Soo Min: Oppression, Breach of Trust, Conspiracy & Accessory Liability(Mar 2023) HE & SF Properties LP v Rising Dragon: Quistclose Trust, Unjust Enrichment, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Conspiracy(May 2019) BTY v BUA: Stay of Litigation & Arbitration Agreement Scope(Oct 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kelvin Koh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.8
Complex Cases: 4 (67%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	26.0 parties avg	6.0	33%
Neutral	16.0 parties avg	6.0	17%
Partial	34.5 parties avg	4.5	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2016	25.5 parties avg	5.5
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	17.0 parties avg	7.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kelvin Koh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(29%)	29%
Neutral	1(14%)	14%
Partial	3(43%)	43%
Won	1(14%)	14%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	20,000.00	5,000.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Liang Xihong v Loong Soo Min: Oppression, Breach of Trust, Conspiracy & Accessory Liability 30 Mar 2023 Yangbum Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	30 Mar 2023	Yangbum Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant): Partial WinSandy is to pay Yangbum costs in respect of her claims in S 275 for an account of dividends and for reinstatement as a joint signatory to Yangbum’s bank accounts, fixed at S$20,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
2	HE & SF Properties LP v Rising Dragon: Quistclose Trust, Unjust Enrichment, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Conspiracy 02 May 2019 Eric Alfred Schaer (Defendant)Partial	02 May 2019	Eric Alfred Schaer (Defendant): Judgment for Plaintiff in part; Judgment for Defendant in partJudgment for Plaintiff against Mr. Eric Alfred Schaer for fraudulent misrepresentation regarding the MySQUAR moneys. Judgment for Defendant in part. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	BTY v BUA: Stay of Litigation & Arbitration Agreement Scope 14 Oct 2018 BTY (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	14 Oct 2018	BTY (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal against the stay of litigation was allowed. The court ordered the Company to pay the plaintiff’s costs fixed at $18,000 including disbursements and costs of the sealing application fixed at $500 including disbursements. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Actis Excalibur Ltd v KS Distribution Pte Ltd: Intervention in Derivative Action for Breach of Fiduciary Duties 30 Oct 2016 Actis Excalibur Limited (Plaintiff)Neutral	30 Oct 2016	Actis Excalibur Limited (Plaintiff): Application granted for proposed interveners to interveneLeave granted for the 1st and 2nd Putative Defendants to intervene in OS 788/2016. No monetary amount specified. Currency assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Vintage Bullion DMCC v Chay Fook Yuen: Statutory Trust, Liquidation & Customer Claims 01 Aug 2016 VINTAGE BULLION DMCC (Appellant)Partial	01 Aug 2016	VINTAGE BULLION DMCC (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part in relation to the sum segregated in the Customer Segregated Accounts to cover the Forward Value arising out of the LFX and Bullion transactions for the Customers on the basis that a statutory trust has been imposed on the said sum. Costs of the proceedings below should be paid out of the liquidation estate on a standard basis (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	MF Global Singapore v Vintage Bullion: Proprietary Claims in Liquidation 24 Jun 2015 Vintage Bullion DMCC (In its own capacity, and for and on behalf of and as representative of all customers of MF Global Singapore Pte Limited (In Creditors' Voluntary Liquidation) who have LFX Claims for Profit (as defined in the Originating Summons filed herein) and/or Bullion Claims for Profit (as defined in the Originating Summons filed herein) (Defendant)Lost	24 Jun 2015	Vintage Bullion DMCC (In its own capacity, and for and on behalf of and as representative of all customers of MF Global Singapore Pte Limited (In Creditors' Voluntary Liquidation) who have LFX Claims for Profit (as defined in the Originating Summons filed herein) and/or Bullion Claims for Profit (as defined in the Originating Summons filed herein) (Defendant): LostJudgment in favor of the Liquidators on the substantive issues.