Kelvin Koh Li Qun

Kelvin Koh Li Qun is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2012 to 2012. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and international arbitration. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kelvin Koh Li Qun has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and international arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kelvin Koh Li Qun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kelvin Koh Li Qun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kelvin Koh Li Qun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kelvin Koh Li Qun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Kelvin Koh Li Qun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kelvin Koh Li Qun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kelvin Koh Li Qun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Interim Measures	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kelvin Koh Li Qun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kelvin Koh Li Qun has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann LLP	1 cases	100% of cases	PT Pukuafu Indah v Newmont Indonesia: Setting Aside Arbitral Order Under International Arbitration Act(Sep 2012)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kelvin Koh Li Qun's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 1 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kelvin Koh Li Qun's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	12,000.00	12,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PT Pukuafu Indah v Newmont Indonesia: Setting Aside Arbitral Order Under International Arbitration Act 10 Sep 2012 NVL (USA) Limited (Defendant)Won	10 Sep 2012	NVL (USA) Limited (Defendant): Successful in opposing applicationSuccessfully opposed the application to set aside the order; costs awarded at $6000 plus reasonable disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).