Kelvin Lee

Kelvin Lee is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in minority oppression and shareholder disputes. Their track record shows a 29.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 71% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kelvin Lee has demonstrated expertise across 41 primary practice areas, with significant experience in business litigation and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Business Litigation	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Kelvin Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Kelvin Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kelvin Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Kelvin Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kelvin Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Kelvin Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Kelvin Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kelvin Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kelvin Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kelvin Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kelvin Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kelvin Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kelvin Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kelvin Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kelvin Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kelvin Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kelvin Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Vicarious liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kelvin Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kelvin Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Interest	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kelvin Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Kelvin Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kelvin Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Financial Advisory	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kelvin Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kelvin Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Proof of Debt	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kelvin Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kelvin Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kelvin Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trademark Infringement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kelvin Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administration of Assets	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kelvin Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Derivative action	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kelvin Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Registration of Title	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Kelvin Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Indefeasibility	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kelvin Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Derivative Actions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kelvin Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Kelvin Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bonus	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kelvin Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kelvin Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Kelvin Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kelvin Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kelvin Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kelvin Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kelvin Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kelvin Lee has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WNLEX LLC	6 cases	86% of cases	Cachet Multi Strategy Fund SPC v Feng Shi: Striking Out Claims & Abuse of Process(Oct 2023) Saimee Bin Jumaat v IPP Financial Advisers: Negligence, Misrepresentation, and Vicarious Liability in Investment Advice(Jul 2019) Chong Chin Fook v Solomon Alliance: Derivative Action, Director Conflict of Interest(Jan 2017)
Samuel Seow Law Corporation	1 cases	14% of cases	Valentino Globe BV v Pacific Rim Industries Inc: Trade Mark Registration Opposition(Mar 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kelvin Lee's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 5 (71%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	53.7 parties avg	3.7	71%
Won	23.0 parties avg	3.0	29%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2017	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2019	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2023	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kelvin Lee's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(71%)	71%
Won	2(29%)	29%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	10,000.00	2,500.004 cases	4
USD	1,241,800.00	1,241,800.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Cachet Multi Strategy Fund SPC v Feng Shi: Striking Out Claims & Abuse of Process 12 Oct 2023 Alex SK Liu (Defendant)Lost	12 Oct 2023	Alex SK Liu (Defendant): Application dismissedThe defendant lost the application to strike out the claims. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Saimee Bin Jumaat v IPP Financial Advisers: Negligence, Misrepresentation, and Vicarious Liability in Investment Advice 03 Jul 2019 Quek Miaw Sian Alice (Defendant)Lost	03 Jul 2019	Quek Miaw Sian Alice (Defendant): Liable for NegligenceMoi and Quek are jointly and severally liable to compensate Saimee the sum of USD$620,900 under the tort of negligence for their negligent misrepresentations (assumed USD, as the judgment specifies USD amounts).
3	Chong Chin Fook v Solomon Alliance: Derivative Action, Director Conflict of Interest 10 Jan 2017 Chong Chin Fook (Zhang Zhenfu) (Appellant, Respondent)Won	10 Jan 2017	Chong Chin Fook (Zhang Zhenfu) (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with conditions. The court ordered that JL and Goh were to pay costs of $15,000 each to the Appellant (inclusive of reasonable disbursements), with the usual consequential orders. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Chia Hang Kiu v Chia Kwok Yeo: Trust, Land Title, and Estate Dispute over Property Ownership 20 Sep 2016 Chia Kok Weng (Defendant, Plaintiff)Lost	20 Sep 2016	Chia Kok Weng (Defendant, Plaintiff): Claim DismissedWeng's claim that Yeo and/or Angie held a one-third share of the property on trust for him was dismissed.
5	Chong Chin Fook v Solomon Alliance Management: Derivative Action & Shareholder Rights 22 Feb 2016 Chong Chin Fook (Zhang Zhenfu) (Plaintiff)Lost	22 Feb 2016	Chong Chin Fook (Zhang Zhenfu) (Plaintiff): Application DismissedPlaintiff's application to take over conduct of Suit 215 was dismissed, and the Plaintiff was ordered to pay costs of $10,000 to each set of Defendants (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Seow Hock Hin v MF Global Singapore: Discretionary Bonuses & Employment Contract Dispute 02 Mar 2014 Seow Hock Hin (Plaintiff)Lost	02 Mar 2014	Seow Hock Hin (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for accrued bonuses was dismissed.
7	Valentino Globe BV v Pacific Rim Industries Inc: Trade Mark Registration Opposition 25 Mar 2010 Pacific Rim Industries Inc (Respondent)Won	25 Mar 2010	Pacific Rim Industries Inc (Respondent): Application for Registration UpheldApplication for registration of the trade mark was upheld (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).