Kelvin Lee Ming Hui

Kelvin Lee Ming Hui is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 16 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 6 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in family law and child custody. Their track record shows a 29.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated expertise across 67 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	9 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	7 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Family Law	5 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized94% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	5 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Divorce	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Child Support	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trademark Infringement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Beneficial Ownership	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Documentary evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intestate succession	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Relocation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Parent-Child Relationship	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intention of Parties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sham Marriage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Marriage of Convenience	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Immigration Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Compact	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Transactions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remisier	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stock Broking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conveyance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conveyancing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Relocation Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized99% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Burden of proof	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kelvin Lee Ming Hui has been affiliated with 6 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 11 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WNLEX LLC	11 cases	69% of cases	Cachet Multi Strategy Fund v Feng Shi: Discovery Dispute over Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Conspiracy(Dec 2024) WGG v WGH: Custody, Matrimonial Assets Division, Wife & Child Maintenance(Sep 2022) Lee Kim Song v Chan Chee Kien: Resulting & Constructive Trusts Dispute(Jan 2021)
Kelvin Chia Partnership	1 cases	6% of cases	Virgin Mobile v Virgin Store: Interim Mareva Injunction for Breach of Contract Dispute(Aug 2002)
Samuel Seow Law Corporation	1 cases	6% of cases	Clinique Laboratories v Clinique Suisse: Trademark Infringement & Passing Off(Jul 2010)
Sankar Ow & Partners LLP	1 cases	6% of cases	Lim Koon Hai v Alex Yeo: Specific Performance of Option to Purchase Dispute(Apr 2013)
Shankar Ow & Partners LLP	1 cases	6% of cases	BGT v BGU: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance Dispute(Feb 2013)
Lee Shergill Partnership	1 cases	6% of cases	Ng Giap Hon v Westcomb Securities: Breach of Contract & Conspiracy Claim over IPO Placement Commissions(Jun 2008)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kelvin Lee Ming Hui's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.4
Complex Cases: 4 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	6%
Lost	83.2 parties avg	3.2	50%
Neutral	23.5 parties avg	3.5	13%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	6%
Won	53.9 parties avg	3.9	31%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2010	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2014	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2015	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	24.3 parties avg	4.3
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kelvin Lee Ming Hui's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(6%)	6%
Lost	8(47%)	47%
Neutral	2(12%)	12%
Partial	1(6%)	6%
Won	5(29%)	29%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	743,033.79	123,838.976 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2014	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2015	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	3 12	Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 16 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Cachet Multi Strategy Fund v Feng Shi: Discovery Dispute over Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Conspiracy 25 Dec 2024 Alex SK Liu (Defendant)Neutral	25 Dec 2024	Alex SK Liu (Defendant): Ordered to file affidavitMr. Liu is ordered to file an affidavit stating whether there exist known adverse documents falling under Appeal Requests (a) to (d) and whether he has them in his possession.
2	WGG v WGH: Custody, Matrimonial Assets Division, Wife & Child Maintenance 12 Sep 2022 WGH (Defendant)Lost	12 Sep 2022	WGH (Defendant): Joint custody of child deniedThe Husband's application for joint custody of the child was denied.
3	Lee Kim Song v Chan Chee Kien: Resulting & Constructive Trusts Dispute 19 Jan 2021 Chan Chee Kien (Defendant)Won	19 Jan 2021	Chan Chee Kien (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim against the defendant was dismissed.
4	Pradeepto Kumar Biswas v East India Capital Management: Employment Contract Dispute and Fiduciary Duty Breach 07 Aug 2019 Indian Ocean Group Pte Ltd (Defendant-in-Counterclaim)Neutral	07 Aug 2019	Indian Ocean Group Pte Ltd (Defendant-in-Counterclaim): No specific outcome mentionedNo specific outcome mentioned for Indian Ocean Group Pte Ltd.
5	Gian Bee Choo v Meng Xianhui: Sham Marriage, Intestate Succession, and CPF Distribution 30 Jul 2019 Gian Beng Hong (Plaintiff)Won	30 Jul 2019	Gian Beng Hong (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffThe court declared the marriage between the Deceased and the Defendant was a sham marriage.
6	Chia Kok Weng v Chia Kwok Yeo: Resulting Trust, Property Dispute 19 Sep 2017 Chia Kok Weng (Appellant, Plaintiff)Won	19 Sep 2017	Chia Kok Weng (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal AllowedThe court allowed the appeal and granted the declaration sought by Weng that Yeo holds a one-third share in the Property on trust for him.
7	SCT Technologies v Western Copper: Burden of Proof in Debt Recovery for Unpaid Invoices 04 Jan 2016 SCT TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD (Appellant)Won	04 Jan 2016	SCT TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; SCT Technologies awarded costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	SCT Technologies v Western Copper: Dispute over Payment for Copper Balls 20 May 2015 SCT TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD (Plaintiff)Lost	20 May 2015	SCT TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe Plaintiff's claim for US$1,274,741.73 was dismissed.
9	BNS v BNT: Child Relocation, Welfare of Child, and Parental Relationships 19 Apr 2015 BNS (Appellant)Lost	19 Apr 2015	BNS (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with no order as to costs.
10	Sharikat Logistics v Ong Boon Chuan: Minority Oppression & Shareholder Dispute 04 Nov 2014 Kok Yin Leong (Defendant)Lost	04 Nov 2014	Kok Yin Leong (Defendant): Liable for OppressionKYL exercised his shareholder’s powers to assist TGDPL in oppressing Sharikat in relation to a number of matters (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	BNT v BNS: Relocation of Children to Canada Dispute 23 Sep 2014 BNS (Respondent, Mother)Lost	23 Sep 2014	BNS (Respondent, Mother): Relocation Application DismissedRelocation application dismissed; ordered to pay the father’s costs of the appeal and the relocation application fixed at $5,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
12	Lim Koon Hai v Alex Yeo: Specific Performance of Option to Purchase Dispute 25 Apr 2013 Another (Plaintiff)Lost	25 Apr 2013	Another (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiffs' claim for specific performance or damages in lieu of specific performance was dismissed.
13	BGT v BGU: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance Dispute 26 Feb 2013 BGT (Plaintiff)Partial	26 Feb 2013	BGT (Plaintiff): Equal division of matrimonial assetsReceived $386,721.15 from the husband to equalize the assets (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
14	Clinique Laboratories v Clinique Suisse: Trademark Infringement & Passing Off 01 Jul 2010 Healthy Glow Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	01 Jul 2010	Healthy Glow Pte Ltd (Defendant): Injunction Granted Against DefendantInjunction granted against the defendant; damages to be assessed by the Registrar (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
15	Ng Giap Hon v Westcomb Securities: Breach of Contract & Conspiracy Claim over IPO Placement Commissions 25 Jun 2008 Ng Giap Hon (Plaintiff)Lost	25 Jun 2008	Ng Giap Hon (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for breach of contract and conspiracy was dismissed with costs.
16	Virgin Mobile v Virgin Store: Interim Mareva Injunction for Breach of Contract Dispute 13 Aug 2002 Virgin Mobile (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Dismissed	13 Aug 2002	Virgin Mobile (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application DismissedPlaintiffs' application for an interim mareva injunction was dismissed.