Kelvin Poon Kin Mun

Kelvin Poon Kin Mun is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2005 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in torts and negligence. Their track record shows a 75.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated expertise across 53 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and torts.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Torts	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Rylands v Fletcher Rule	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Private nuisance	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rules of construction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Apportionment of Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Writ of Seizure and Sale	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bill of costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Indemnity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Taxation of Legal Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Art Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Water Damage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantor's Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kelvin Poon Kin Mun has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann LLP	4 cases	50% of cases	Ho See Jui v Liquid Advertising: Water Damage to Art Gallery & Damages Assessment(Aug 2012) Goh Sin Huat v Ho See Jui: Negligence, Private Nuisance, Water Leakage & Damage to Art(Jun 2012) Ho See Jui v Liquid Advertising: Negligence, Nuisance & Rylands v Fletcher in Water Damage Claim(Apr 2011)
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	3 cases	38% of cases	Lim Siau Hing v Compass Consulting: Contractual Terms & Construction Rules in Reverse Takeover Dispute(Nov 2023) Bi Xiaoqiong v China Medical Technologies: Mareva Injunction & Foreign Proceedings(Sep 2019) BLG v BLI: Review of Bill of Costs in Mental Capacity Act Application(Apr 2018)
Rajah and Tann	1 cases	13% of cases	Wan Soon Construction Pte Ltd v Deschen Holdings Ltd: Priority of Unsecured Creditor's Writ of Seizure and Sale in Judicial Management(Jun 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kelvin Poon Kin Mun's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.4
Complex Cases: 2 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	13%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	13%
Won	63.6 parties avg	3.6	75%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2011	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2012	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2019	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kelvin Poon Kin Mun's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(13%)	13%
Partial	1(13%)	13%
Won	6(75%)	75%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	567,040.40	189,013.473 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lim Siau Hing v Compass Consulting: Contractual Terms & Construction Rules in Reverse Takeover Dispute 23 Nov 2023 Lim Siau Hing @ Lim Kim Hoe (Appellant, Defendant)Partial	23 Nov 2023	Lim Siau Hing @ Lim Kim Hoe (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; not liable for bonus shares or cash fee.
2	Bi Xiaoqiong v China Medical Technologies: Mareva Injunction & Foreign Proceedings 29 Sep 2019 China Medical Technologies, Inc (in liquidation) (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	29 Sep 2019	China Medical Technologies, Inc (in liquidation) (Respondent, Plaintiff): Mareva Injunction GrantedMareva injunction against Ms. Bi was upheld.
3	BLG v BLI: Review of Bill of Costs in Mental Capacity Act Application 11 Apr 2018 BLJ (Respondent)Won	11 Apr 2018	BLJ (Respondent): Summons dismissedThe applicants' summons for the first and second respondents to produce documents setting out a breakdown of the total number of hours spent by each of their lawyers was dismissed.
4	Ho See Jui v Liquid Advertising: Water Damage to Art Gallery & Damages Assessment 07 Aug 2012 Ho See Jui (trading as Xuanhua Art Gallery) (Plaintiff)Won	07 Aug 2012	Ho See Jui (trading as Xuanhua Art Gallery) (Plaintiff): Judgment for the PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $567,040.40 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Goh Sin Huat v Ho See Jui: Negligence, Private Nuisance, Water Leakage & Damage to Art 25 Jun 2012 Ho See Jui (trading as Xuanhua Art Gallery) (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	25 Jun 2012	Ho See Jui (trading as Xuanhua Art Gallery) (Respondent, Plaintiff): Judgment in favour of Ho See JuiJudgment in favour of Ho See Jui with costs to be borne by Liquid Advertising and the appellant. The Judge ordered that liability between Liquid Advertising and the appellant be apportioned in the following proportions: 30% to be borne by Liquid Advertising and 70% to be borne by the appellant.
6	Ho See Jui v Liquid Advertising: Negligence, Nuisance & Rylands v Fletcher in Water Damage Claim 28 Apr 2011 Ho See Jui (trading as Xuanhua Art Gallery) (Plaintiff)Won	28 Apr 2011	Ho See Jui (trading as Xuanhua Art Gallery) (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages to be assessed by the Registrar (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Pacific King Shipping v Glory Wealth Shipping: Stay of Winding Up Petition 06 Jun 2010 Another (Plaintiff)Lost	06 Jun 2010	Another (Plaintiff): Application DismissedApplication to stay or strike out the winding up petitions filed by the defendant is dismissed; costs to the defendant to be agreed or taxed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Wan Soon Construction Pte Ltd v Deschen Holdings Ltd: Priority of Unsecured Creditor's Writ of Seizure and Sale in Judicial Management 13 Jun 2005 Wan Soon Construction Pte Ltd (Applicant)Won	13 Jun 2005	Wan Soon Construction Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application allowedThe company's application was allowed, meaning the respondent is not entitled to the proceeds of sale of the company’s property.