Kelvin Tan Teck San

Kelvin Tan Teck San is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2005 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in bankruptcy and winding up. Their track record shows a 57.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kelvin Tan Teck San has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	16% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Kelvin Tan Teck San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 16% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kelvin Tan Teck San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kelvin Tan Teck San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kelvin Tan Teck San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kelvin Tan Teck San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Kelvin Tan Teck San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Moneylenders Act	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Kelvin Tan Teck San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kelvin Tan Teck San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kelvin Tan Teck San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kelvin Tan Teck San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kelvin Tan Teck San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kelvin Tan Teck San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Horse Racing	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kelvin Tan Teck San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kelvin Tan Teck San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Kelvin Tan Teck San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kelvin Tan Teck San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Ad Hoc Admission	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kelvin Tan Teck San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholder Rights	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kelvin Tan Teck San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kelvin Tan Teck San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kelvin Tan Teck San has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	5 cases	71% of cases	Marina Bay Sands Pte Ltd v Luo Shandong: Summary Judgment and Debt Repayment Dispute(Feb 2018) Orion Oil Ltd v Agus Anwar: Bankruptcy Application & Moneylenders Act(Dec 2010) Agus Anwar v Gainsford Capital Ltd: Setting Aside Statutory Demand for Disputed Debt(Jan 2010)
Drew and Napier LLC	1 cases	14% of cases	Sim Yong Kim v Evenstar Investments: Winding Up Petition on Just and Equitable Grounds(Dec 2005)
Law Society of Singapore	1 cases	14% of cases	Re Caplan Jonathan Michael QC: Application for Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel in Jockey's Appeal(Jul 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kelvin Tan Teck San's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.1
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	29%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	14%
Won	42.3 parties avg	2.3	57%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2010	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kelvin Tan Teck San's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(29%)	29%
Partial	1(14%)	14%
Won	4(57%)	57%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3,511,200.00	585,200.006 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2010	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Marina Bay Sands Pte Ltd v Luo Shandong: Summary Judgment and Debt Repayment Dispute 26 Feb 2018 MARINA BAY SANDS PTE LTD (Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	26 Feb 2018	MARINA BAY SANDS PTE LTD (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; the defendant was granted conditional leave to defend, requiring him to pay $3,500,000 into court within 14 days. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Orion Oil Ltd v Agus Anwar: Bankruptcy Application & Moneylenders Act 07 Dec 2010 Orion Oil Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	07 Dec 2010	Orion Oil Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
3	Agus Anwar v Gainsford Capital Ltd: Setting Aside Statutory Demand for Disputed Debt 05 Jan 2010 Gainsford Capital Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	05 Jan 2010	Gainsford Capital Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; statutory demand remains set aside. Ordered to pay costs of $1,200 to the plaintiff. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Agus Anwar v Orion Oil Ltd: Moneylender Act & Enforceability of Loan Contracts 05 Jan 2010 Orion Oil Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Won	05 Jan 2010	Orion Oil Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe defendant's appeal against the assistant registrar's decision was allowed.
5	Re Caplan Jonathan Michael QC: Application for Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel in Jockey's Appeal 18 Jul 2006 Law Society of Singapore (Respondent)Won	18 Jul 2006	Law Society of Singapore (Respondent): Opposition SuccessfulThe Law Society of Singapore successfully opposed the application (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Sim Yong Kim v Evenstar Investments: Winding Up on Just and Equitable Grounds 17 Jul 2006 Evenstar Investments Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	17 Jul 2006	Evenstar Investments Pte Ltd (Respondent): Winding-up OrderEvenstar Investments Pte Ltd ordered to be wound up, subject to conditions and directions.
7	Sim Yong Kim v Evenstar Investments: Winding Up Petition on Just and Equitable Grounds 22 Dec 2005 Evenstar Investments Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	22 Dec 2005	Evenstar Investments Pte Ltd (Respondent): Petition dismissedThe petition to wind up the company was dismissed with costs of $10,000 to be paid by the petitioner to the company (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).