Kelvin (Xu Liqun)

Kelvin (Xu Liqun) is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and costs. Their track record shows a 29.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kelvin (Xu Liqun) has demonstrated expertise across 18 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil practice and costs.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Practice	3 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kelvin (Xu Liqun) has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kelvin (Xu Liqun) has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Kelvin (Xu Liqun) has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kelvin (Xu Liqun) has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Kelvin (Xu Liqun) has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Kelvin (Xu Liqun) has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Offer to Settle	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kelvin (Xu Liqun) has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kelvin (Xu Liqun) has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kelvin (Xu Liqun) has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kelvin (Xu Liqun) has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Disbursements	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kelvin (Xu Liqun) has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kelvin (Xu Liqun) has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kelvin (Xu Liqun) has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Kelvin (Xu Liqun) has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Discovery of documents	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kelvin (Xu Liqun) has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kelvin (Xu Liqun) has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kelvin (Xu Liqun) has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kelvin (Xu Liqun) has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kelvin (Xu Liqun) has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
TSMP Law Corporation	5 cases	100% of cases	Mustaq Ahmad v Providentia Wealth Management: Beneficiary Rights & Estate Administration(Nov 2023) Mustaq Ahmad v Providentia Wealth Management: Interim Distribution of Estate Shares Dispute(Nov 2023) La Dolce Vita v Zhang Lan: Discovery of Banker's Books & Banking Secrecy(Apr 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kelvin (Xu Liqun)'s case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.3
Complex Cases: 5 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	34.3 parties avg	4.3	60%
Neutral	24.0 parties avg	4.0	40%
Won	28.0 parties avg	8.0	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2022	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2023	28.0 parties avg	8.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kelvin (Xu Liqun)'s case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(43%)	43%
Neutral	2(29%)	29%
Won	2(29%)	29%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	780,000.00	390,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	4 22	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 2 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Mustaq Ahmad v Providentia Wealth Management: Beneficiary Rights & Estate Administration 29 Nov 2023 Providentia Wealth Management Ltd (Respondent)Won	29 Nov 2023	Providentia Wealth Management Ltd (Respondent): Application dismissedThe application against Providentia for disclosure of communications was dismissed.
2	Mustaq Ahmad v Providentia Wealth Management: Interim Distribution of Estate Shares Dispute 29 Nov 2023 Providentia Wealth Management Ltd (Respondent)Won	29 Nov 2023	Providentia Wealth Management Ltd (Respondent): Application dismissedThe application against the respondent was dismissed.
3	La Dolce Vita v Zhang Lan: Discovery of Banker's Books & Banking Secrecy 20 Apr 2022 Success Elegant Trading Limited (Defendant)Lost	20 Apr 2022	Success Elegant Trading Limited (Defendant): Appeal dismissedAppeal against discovery order dismissed, but the order was varied.
4	Seraya Energy v Denka Advantech: Costs & Disbursements in Electricity Contract Dispute 17 Apr 2019 YTL PowerSeraya Pte Limited (Third Party)Neutral	17 Apr 2019	YTL PowerSeraya Pte Limited (Third Party): NeutralNo specific outcome mentioned for the third party in this judgment on costs and disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Seraya Energy v Denka Advantech: Costs & Disbursements in Electricity Contract Dispute 28 Jan 2019 YTL PowerSeraya Pte Limited (Third Party)Neutral	28 Jan 2019	YTL PowerSeraya Pte Limited (Third Party): NeutralNo specific outcome mentioned for YTL PowerSeraya Pte Limited in this judgment on costs and disbursements. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).