Kenii Takashima

Kenii Takashima is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in property law and real estate. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kenii Takashima has demonstrated expertise across 28 primary practice areas, with significant experience in evidence and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Evidence	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kenii Takashima has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Kenii Takashima has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Kenii Takashima has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Kenii Takashima has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kenii Takashima has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kenii Takashima has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenii Takashima has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kenii Takashima has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kenii Takashima has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kenii Takashima has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kenii Takashima has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Admission to the Bar	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized100% relevance score	Kenii Takashima has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kenii Takashima has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sale of Land	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kenii Takashima has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kenii Takashima has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kenii Takashima has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kenii Takashima has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kenii Takashima has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kenii Takashima has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Verbal Agreements	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kenii Takashima has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kenii Takashima has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kenii Takashima has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Protection from Harassment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kenii Takashima has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Satisfactory Quality	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kenii Takashima has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Unlawful stalking	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kenii Takashima has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenii Takashima has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kenii Takashima has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kenii Takashima has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kenii Takashima has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
CTLC Law Corporation	3 cases	60% of cases	Ang Hong Wei v Ang Teng Hai: Summary Judgment, Verbal Agreements & Property Sale(Jan 2024) Sun Yanyuan v Ng Yit Beng: Sale of Flat Under Court Order(Nov 2022) Ten-League Corporations Pte Ltd v Debenho Pte Ltd: Sale of Goods - Satisfactory Quality & Proof of Evidence(Feb 2022)
Ray Louis Law Corporation	1 cases	20% of cases	Sim Kang Wei v Public Prosecutor: Unlawful Stalking and Theft under POHA and Penal Code(May 2019)
Tan Jeh Yaw LLC	1 cases	20% of cases	Re Kuoh Hao Teng: Admission to the Bar Dispute over Practice Training Requirements(Apr 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kenii Takashima's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Partial	33.8 parties avg	3.8	60%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kenii Takashima's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(20%)	20%
Partial	3(60%)	60%
Won	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	326,700.00	163,350.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ang Hong Wei v Ang Teng Hai: Summary Judgment, Verbal Agreements & Property Sale 18 Jan 2024 Ang Pei Ting (Claimant)Partial	18 Jan 2024	Ang Pei Ting (Claimant): Partial Summary Judgment GrantedSummary judgment granted in favour of the Claimants for $108,900, plus interest at the rate of 5.33% per annum from the date of the claim to the date of judgment (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Sun Yanyuan v Ng Yit Beng: Sale of Flat Under Court Order 13 Nov 2022 Ng Yit Beng (Respondent)Partial	13 Nov 2022	Ng Yit Beng (Respondent): Orders made for respondent to have right of first refusal to purchase applicant's share of the flat, failing which the flat will be sold on the open market.Orders made for respondent to have right of first refusal to purchase applicant's share of the flat, failing which the flat will be sold on the open market. No monetary amount was specified. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Ten-League Corporations Pte Ltd v Debenho Pte Ltd: Sale of Goods - Satisfactory Quality & Proof of Evidence 15 Feb 2022 Ten-League Corporations Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	15 Feb 2022	Ten-League Corporations Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe seller's appeal was allowed, and the judgment below was set aside.
4	Re Kuoh Hao Teng: Admission to the Bar Dispute over Practice Training Requirements 08 Apr 2021 Tan Jeh Yaw (Other)Neutral	08 Apr 2021	Tan Jeh Yaw (Other): Objections WithdrawnMr. Tan withdrew his objections to Mr. Kuoh’s application under AAS 718.
5	Sim Kang Wei v Public Prosecutor: Unlawful Stalking and Theft under POHA and Penal Code 20 May 2019 Sim Kang Wei (Appellant)Partial	20 May 2019	Sim Kang Wei (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partThe appeal in respect of the offence of unlawful stalking under s 7 of POHA was allowed and the sentence of imprisonment was reduced from ten months to five months. The sentence of three days’ imprisonment in respect of the theft offence was not disturbed and both sentences run concurrently.