Kenneth Chin

Kenneth Chin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2016. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and criminal procedure. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kenneth Chin has demonstrated expertise across 14 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	3 cases	16% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Kenneth Chin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 16% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	3 cases	16% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kenneth Chin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 16% of their total caseload.
Rape	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kenneth Chin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kenneth Chin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Falsification of Accounts	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Chin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Chin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Falsification of Documents	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kenneth Chin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kenneth Chin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Bail	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kenneth Chin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Sexual assault	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kenneth Chin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kenneth Chin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Flight Risk	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kenneth Chin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kenneth Chin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kenneth Chin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kenneth Chin has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	3 cases	100% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Pram Nair: Sentencing for Rape and Sexual Assault(Oct 2016) PP v Pram Nair: Rape & Sexual Penetration - Consent & Intoxication(Jul 2016) Public Prosecutor v Yang Yin: Revision of Bail Order for Falsification of Accounts(Jan 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kenneth Chin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	32.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kenneth Chin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	3(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v Pram Nair: Sentencing for Rape and Sexual Assault 02 Oct 2016 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	02 Oct 2016	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for the ProsecutionAccused sentenced to 11 years and 19 days’ imprisonment and six strokes of the cane for each of the two offences, sentences to run concurrently.
2	PP v Pram Nair: Rape & Sexual Penetration - Consent & Intoxication 17 Jul 2016 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	17 Jul 2016	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for the ProsecutionAccused convicted on both charges.
3	Public Prosecutor v Yang Yin: Revision of Bail Order for Falsification of Accounts 07 Jan 2015 Public Prosecutor (Applicant)Won	07 Jan 2015	Public Prosecutor (Applicant): Application AllowedThe Public Prosecutor's application for revision was allowed.