Kenneth Wong

Kenneth Wong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal procedure and drug crimes. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kenneth Wong has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	3 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Kenneth Wong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	3 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Kenneth Wong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kenneth Wong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Wong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Kenneth Wong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Wong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Wong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Wong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kenneth Wong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Money and moneylenders	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kenneth Wong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kenneth Wong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kenneth Wong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kenneth Wong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy to Defraud	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Wong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kenneth Wong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kenneth Wong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Falsification of Documents	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kenneth Wong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kenneth Wong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Wong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kenneth Wong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Mutual Legal Assistance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kenneth Wong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kenneth Wong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kenneth Wong has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	3 cases	60% of cases	Steep Rise Ltd v Attorney-General: Duty of Full Disclosure & Enforcement of Foreign Confiscation Order under MACMA(Mar 2020) PP v Li Weiming: Criminal Case Disclosure, Intent to Defraud, Falsification of Accounts(Jan 2014) Mervin Singh v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Presumption of Knowledge, and Rebuttal(Mar 2013)
Cavenagh Law LLP	1 cases	20% of cases	Macquarie Bank v. Graceland Industry: Commodity Swap, Mistake & Fiduciary Duty(May 2018)
Deputy Public Prosecutors	1 cases	20% of cases	PP v Quek Li Hao: Loan Shark Harassment & Moneylenders Act Penalties(Aug 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kenneth Wong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	20%
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	20%
Won	32.3 parties avg	2.3	60%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2014	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kenneth Wong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20%)	20%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	3(60%)	60%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	40,000.00	40,000.001 cases	1
USD	1,200,000.00	1,200,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2014	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Steep Rise Ltd v Attorney-General: Duty of Full Disclosure & Enforcement of Foreign Confiscation Order under MACMA 23 Mar 2020 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	23 Mar 2020	Attorney-General (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Attorney-General awarded costs of $40,000 from Steep Rise Limited (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Macquarie Bank v. Graceland Industry: Commodity Swap, Mistake & Fiduciary Duty 03 May 2018 MACQUARIE BANK LIMITED (Plaintiff, Defendant)Won	03 May 2018	MACQUARIE BANK LIMITED (Plaintiff, Defendant): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff in the amount of $1,200,000 (assumed USD, as the judgment involves a US dollar amount and the parties were discussing international transactions).
3	PP v Li Weiming: Criminal Case Disclosure, Intent to Defraud, Falsification of Accounts 22 Jan 2014 Public Prosecutor (Applicant)Partial	22 Jan 2014	Public Prosecutor (Applicant): Orders for particulars set asideThe court set aside the Judge’s orders that the PP provide the respondents with (a) the identity of the persons whom the respondents allegedly conspired to defraud and (b) the reasons why the subcontract between ZTE and Questzone was allegedly fictitious.
4	PP v Quek Li Hao: Loan Shark Harassment & Moneylenders Act Penalties 12 Aug 2013 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	12 Aug 2013	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Prosecution's appeal against the sentences imposed by the District Judge was allowed.
5	Mervin Singh v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Presumption of Knowledge, and Rebuttal 07 Mar 2013 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	07 Mar 2013	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Court of Appeal allowed the First Appellant's appeal, finding that he rebutted the presumption in s 18(2) of the MDA on a balance of probabilities.