Keow Mei-Yen

Keow Mei-Yen is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2009. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in documentary credits and torts. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 67% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Keow Mei-Yen has demonstrated expertise across 14 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and fraud and deceit.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	18% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Keow Mei-Yen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Keow Mei-Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Keow Mei-Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Keow Mei-Yen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Documentary Credits	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Keow Mei-Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Keow Mei-Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Keow Mei-Yen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Keow Mei-Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Keow Mei-Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Keow Mei-Yen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Keow Mei-Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Keow Mei-Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Keow Mei-Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Keow Mei-Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Keow Mei-Yen has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	3 cases	100% of cases	Lim Leong Huat v Chip Hup Hup Kee Construction: Conspiracy & Director Liability(Jan 2009) DBS Bank v Carrier Singapore: Deceit in Letter of Credit Transaction(Apr 2008) Lim Leong Huat v Chip Hup Hup Kee Construction: Summary Judgment & Pleading Requirements(Jan 2008)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Keow Mei-Yen's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 2 (67%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.3 parties avg	3.3	67%
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	23.3 parties avg	3.3
2009	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Keow Mei-Yen's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(67%)	67%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	426,700.00	426,700.001 cases	1
USD	1,171,678.02	1,171,678.021 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lim Leong Huat v Chip Hup Hup Kee Construction: Conspiracy & Director Liability 05 Jan 2009 Lim Leong Huat (Plaintiff, First Defendant)Won	05 Jan 2009	Lim Leong Huat (Plaintiff, First Defendant): Application AllowedApplication to add Neo Kok Eng as a defendant was allowed.
2	DBS Bank v Carrier Singapore: Deceit in Letter of Credit Transaction 08 Apr 2008 Carrier Singapore (Pte) Ltd (Defendant)Lost	08 Apr 2008	Carrier Singapore (Pte) Ltd (Defendant): Liable in damages for fraudulent misrepresentationThe court found Carrier liable in damages for fraudulent misrepresentation to DBS in the sum of US$1,395,748.02 less the benefit received in the sum of US$224,070. Assumed USD, as the judgment involves transactions in USD.
3	Lim Leong Huat v Chip Hup Hup Kee Construction: Summary Judgment & Pleading Requirements 24 Jan 2008 Tan Siew Lim (Other)Lost	24 Jan 2008	Tan Siew Lim (Other): Judgment againstJudgment against Tan Siew Lim for $426,700 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).