Keoy Soo Khim

Keoy Soo Khim is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2001. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in company law and winding up. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 60% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated expertise across 51 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contracts	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Accounting Irregularities	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvent Trading	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Financial Disclosure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Rights	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent Conveyance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misappropriation of Funds	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Quasi-partnership	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Auditing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sham Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Liquidators	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Provisional liquidators	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Veil	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Power of Sale	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Cheques	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Financial Reporting	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Gaming contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Charitable Giving	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sham Agreements	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Keoy Soo Khim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Keoy Soo Khim has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ang & Partners	5 cases	100% of cases	Tong Tien See Construction Pte Ltd v Tong Tien See: Director's Breach of Duty and Conspiracy to Defraud Creditors(Dec 2001) Tong Tien See Construction v Tong Tien See: Breach of Director's Duties & Shadow Director Liability(Dec 2001) Star City v Tan: Gaming Contract & Illegality under Civil Law Act(May 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Keoy Soo Khim's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 7.8
Complex Cases: 3 (60%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Unknown	17.0 parties avg	7.0	20%
Won	310.0 parties avg	10.0	60%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	57.8 parties avg	7.8

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Keoy Soo Khim's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20%)	20%
Unknown	1(20%)	20%
Won	3(60%)	60%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	106,600,000.00	26,650,000.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	5 113	Lost: 1 cases (20.0%) Unknown: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 3 cases (60.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Tong Tien See Construction Pte Ltd v Tong Tien See: Director's Breach of Duty and Conspiracy to Defraud Creditors 30 Dec 2001 Tong Tien See Construction Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff)Won	30 Dec 2001	Tong Tien See Construction Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment against the First, Second, Third and Sixth Defendants for the loss/damage suffered by the Plaintiff company by reason of the conspiracy to injure by unlawful means in the sum of $53.3 million. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Tong Tien See Construction v Tong Tien See: Breach of Director's Duties & Shadow Director Liability 30 Dec 2001 Tong Tien See Construction Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff)Won	30 Dec 2001	Tong Tien See Construction Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment against the first, second, third, and sixth defendants for $53.3 million due to conspiracy to injure by unlawful means. Judgment against the first, second, and third defendants for $53.3 million due to breaches of fiduciary duty. Declaration that the first, second, and third defendants were knowingly parties to the carrying on of the business of the plaintiff company with intent to defraud its creditors and that they were liable to the plaintiff company for the said $53.3m. Judgment against the eighth and the twelfth defendants for a declaration that they held $984,899.60 as constructive trustees for the plaintiff company. Declaration that the seventh defendant received $7m from the plaintiff company as constructive trustees. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Star City v Tan: Gaming Contract & Illegality under Civil Law Act 20 May 2001 Star City Pty Ltd (formerly known as Sydney Harbour Casino Pty Ltd) (Plaintiff)Lost	20 May 2001	Star City Pty Ltd (formerly known as Sydney Harbour Casino Pty Ltd) (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for AUD 194,840 dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (SGD) is assumed.
4	Chileon v Choong Wai Phwee: Trustees' Power to Sell Property & Equitable Estoppel 06 Mar 2001 Choong Wai Phwee and Others (Trustees of Cheng Liam Um Vegetarian Temple) (Respondent)Won	06 Mar 2001	Choong Wai Phwee and Others (Trustees of Cheng Liam Um Vegetarian Temple) (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The deposit as security for costs, with interest, if any, is to be paid to the respondents or their solicitors to account of costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Re Sen Art Pte Ltd: Winding Up Petition Based on 'Just and Equitable Ground' Due to Irretrievable Breakdown Between Shareholders 01 Mar 2001 Decor Construction & Trading Pte Limited (Other)	01 Mar 2001	Decor Construction & Trading Pte Limited (Other): -