Ker Yanguang

Ker Yanguang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 36 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and international commercial arbitration. Their track record shows a 58.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 16 complex cases, representing 44% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ker Yanguang has demonstrated expertise across 118 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	19 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 19 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	14 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 14 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	11 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	9 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	7 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	7 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	7 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	6 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice29% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice31% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice24% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Implied Terms	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Arbitral Awards	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Limitation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Scope of Works	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Nominal damages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Scope of submission	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Arbitral procedure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statement of Affairs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy Order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Alteration of Charge	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Derivative Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Freezing Injunction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Limitation of Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wasted Costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mechanical and Electrical Design	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Design Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fitness for Purpose Warranty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guerrilla tactics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Convertible Loan Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conversion of Shares	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Reversionary damage	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Convertible Loan Agreements	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cross-Default	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Formation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Recognition of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trusts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Extension of Validity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Ad Hoc Admission	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Comity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Vexatious and oppressive conduct	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interim injunctions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Constructive trusts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Architects, Engineers and Surveyors	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory obligations	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of natural justice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Indemnity costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Proportionality	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Reasonableness	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Service of document out of jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Anticipatory Breach	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Variation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rules of court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ker Yanguang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ker Yanguang has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 21 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Morgan Lewis Stamford LLC	21 cases	58% of cases	Phoenixfin Pte Ltd v Convexity Ltd: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice(Mar 2022) Then Feng v Contingent Creditors: Debtor's Bankruptcy Application and Statement of Affairs(Jan 2022) Imran v PP; Tamilselvam v PP: Retrial Ordered for MDA Offences After Co-Accused Acquittal(Sep 2021)
Prolegis LLC	12 cases	33% of cases	Deutsche Bank AG v Lee Yung-Te: Extension of Originating Application Validity(Feb 2025) FIC Properties v PT Rajawali: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Fraud, Illegality, Natural Justice(Dec 2024) Udenna Corp v Pertamina: Setting Aside Service of Process in International Arbitration Enforcement(Nov 2024)
Stamford Law Corporation	2 cases	6% of cases	Tembusu Growth Fund v ACTAtek: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Breach of Contract(Aug 2015) Quek Hock Lye v PP: Constitutionality of Misuse of Drugs Act Amendment on Death Penalty(Jan 2015)
MorganLewis Stamford LLC	1 cases	3% of cases	ACTAtek v Tembusu: Misrepresentation, Implied Terms & Breach of Contract in Convertible Loan Agreements(Aug 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ker Yanguang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 16 (44%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	84.3 parties avg	4.3	22%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	3%
Partial	43.5 parties avg	3.5	11%
Remanded	14.0 parties avg	4.0	3%
Reserved	14.0 parties avg	4.0	3%
Won	214.0 parties avg	4.0	58%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	33.3 parties avg	3.3
2016	53.5 parties avg	3.5
2017	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2019	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	45.0 parties avg	5.0
2021	63.9 parties avg	3.9
2022	28.0 parties avg	8.0
2024	113.1 parties avg	3.1
2025	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ker Yanguang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	8(22%)	22%
Neutral	1(3%)	3%
Partial	4(11%)	11%
Remanded	1(3%)	3%
Reserved	1(3%)	3%
Won	21(58%)	58%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
RMB	60,050,000.00	60,050,000.001 cases	1
SGD	4,717,450.08	235,872.5020 cases	20
USD	22,403,443.88	7,467,814.633 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2016	5 212	Lost: 2 cases (40.0%) Partial: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 2 cases (40.0%)
2017	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2020	4 112	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Reserved: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2021	6 1113	Lost: 1 cases (16.7%) Partial: 1 cases (16.7%) Remanded: 1 cases (16.7%) Won: 3 cases (50.0%)
2022	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2024	11 119	Lost: 1 cases (9.1%) Neutral: 1 cases (9.1%) Won: 9 cases (81.8%)
2025	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 36 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Deutsche Bank AG v Lee Yung-Te: Extension of Originating Application Validity 03 Feb 2025 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft (Claimant)Partial	03 Feb 2025	Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft (Claimant): Application granted in partOriginating Application validity extended for two months.
2	FIC Properties v PT Rajawali: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Fraud, Illegality, Natural Justice 15 Dec 2024 FIC Properties Sdn Bhd (Claimant, Defendant)Won	15 Dec 2024	FIC Properties Sdn Bhd (Claimant, Defendant): Applications dismissedThe Rajawalis' applications to set aside the Second Award and the Enforcement Order were dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Udenna Corp v Pertamina: Setting Aside Service of Process in International Arbitration Enforcement 26 Nov 2024 Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Respondent, Applicant, Claimant)Won	26 Nov 2024	Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Respondent, Applicant, Claimant): Costs awardedPIMD was awarded costs of USD 5,000, payable by Udenna. The currency is assumed to be USD as it was requested by PIMD.
4	STS Seatoshore Group v Wansa Commodities: Anti-Suit Injunction & Arbitration Agreement Dispute 21 Oct 2024 Wansa Commodities Pte Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	21 Oct 2024	Wansa Commodities Pte Ltd (Defendant): Inquiry as to Damages DeclinedWansa's request for an inquiry as to damages was declined.
5	Lee Cheng Ling v Argyle Fund Investments: Resulting & Constructive Trusts Dispute 09 Oct 2024 Argyle Fund Investments Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	09 Oct 2024	Argyle Fund Investments Pte Ltd (Respondent): Costs awardedCosts awarded in favour of Argyle and fixed at $34,000, to be borne by Mdm Lee and Mr Lim on a joint and several basis (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	MCST No 4099 v KTP Consultants: Limitation Act & Negligence in Cladding Installation 08 Oct 2024 KTP Consultants Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Lost	08 Oct 2024	KTP Consultants Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Striking Out Set AsideStriking out of KTP as a party was set aside, and the MCST was awarded costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Pertamina v Phoenix Petroleum: Setting Aside Service of Process in SICC Arbitration Enforcement 26 Sep 2024 Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Claimant)Won	26 Sep 2024	Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Claimant): Application grantedApplication to set aside service of originating application dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, assuming SGD for Singapore.
8	Pertamina v Phoenix Petroleum: Costs Dispute in Anti-Suit Injunction & Enforcement of Arbitration Award 05 Sep 2024 Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Claimant)Won	05 Sep 2024	Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Claimant): Costs awardedCosts awarded in the sum of $319,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Pertamina v. Phoenix: Anti-Suit Injunction & Arbitration Agreement Scope. Dispute over unpaid petroleum product shipments. 27 Jun 2024 Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Claimant, Applicant)Won	27 Jun 2024	Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Claimant, Applicant): Application GrantedRelief sought in Originating Application No 1 of 2024 granted. Costs of OA 1 and OA 23 including SUM 21 to be paid by Phoenix, such costs to be assessed by the court unless otherwise agreed by the parties. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Pertamina v P-H-O-E-N-I-X: Costs for Contempt of Court in Arbitration Enforcement 27 Jun 2024 Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Claimant)Won	27 Jun 2024	Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Claimant): Costs awardedCosts of SUM 8 awarded in the sum of $205,880.41 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	Este Villa MCST v TPS Construction: Limitation Act & Striking Out in Construction Defect Case 09 Jun 2024 KTP Consultants Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent, Appellant)Won	09 Jun 2024	KTP Consultants Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent, Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartKTP's appeal against the decision of the learned Assistant Registrar to dismiss KTP’s application in HC/SUM 2609/2023 (“SUM 2609”) to strike out the plaintiff’s case against KTP in HC/S 143/2022 (the “Suit”) was allowed in part. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	Pertamina v P-H-O-E-N-I-X: Anti-Suit Injunction & Arbitration Agreement Dispute 25 Apr 2024 Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Claimant)Won	25 Apr 2024	Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Claimant): Applications in Summons 8 dismissed; orders in ORC 5 to standApplications in Summons 8 dismissed; orders in ORC 5 to stand. No monetary amount awarded.
13	Phoenixfin Pte Ltd v Convexity Ltd: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice 06 Mar 2022 Convexity Ltd (Respondent)Won	06 Mar 2022	Convexity Ltd (Respondent): Appeal UpheldThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the High Court's decision to set aside part of the arbitral award.
14	Then Feng v Contingent Creditors: Debtor's Bankruptcy Application and Statement of Affairs 02 Jan 2022 5 And 2 Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	02 Jan 2022	5 And 2 Pte Ltd (Respondent): Successful OppositionSuccessfully opposed the bankruptcy application.
15	Imran v PP; Tamilselvam v PP: Retrial Ordered for MDA Offences After Co-Accused Acquittal 22 Sep 2021 Imran bin Mohd Arip (Appellant)Remanded	22 Sep 2021	Imran bin Mohd Arip (Appellant): Retrial OrderedJoint retrial of the amended charge ordered before a different judge of the General Division of the High Court.
16	Micro Tellers Network v Cheng Yi Han: Deceit Claim over Misappropriated Funds 21 Sep 2021 5 And 2 Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	21 Sep 2021	5 And 2 Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff on the deceit claim; damages to be assessed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	Reignwood v Opus Tiger: Joinder Application in Derivative Action 22 Jun 2021 Shanghai Shipyard Co Ltd (Applicant)Lost	22 Jun 2021	Shanghai Shipyard Co Ltd (Applicant): Application for joinder dismissedShanghai Shipyard's application to be joined as a party to the s 216A applications was dismissed.
18	Convexity Ltd v Phoenixfin Pte Ltd: Enforcement of Arbitration Award and Freezing Injunction 30 May 2021 Convexity Ltd (Applicant)Won	30 May 2021	Convexity Ltd (Applicant): Freezing injunction grantedFreezing injunction granted up to US$2.8 million.
19	CDM v CDP: Appeal Dismissed on Arbitral Award Regarding Vessel Launch & Payment Instalment 04 May 2021 CDP (Respondent)Won	04 May 2021	CDP (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; CDP awarded costs of SGD 40,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
20	Convexity Ltd v Phoenixfin Pte Ltd: Setting Aside Arbitration Award Based on Unpleaded Penalty Issue 18 Apr 2021 Convexity Ltd (Applicant)Partial	18 Apr 2021	Convexity Ltd (Applicant): Application to set aside the award granted in partApplication to set aside the award granted in part, specifically paragraphs 110-128 and 141(a) of the Award, on the Penalty Issue; and paragraphs 139-140 and 141(f) of the Award, on the tribunal’s costs decision.
21	Imran v PP: Drug Trafficking, Common Intention, Wilful Blindness, Misuse of Drugs Act 17 Dec 2020 Imran bin Mohd Arip (Appellant)Reserved	17 Dec 2020	Imran bin Mohd Arip (Appellant): To be determinedThe court invited the Prosecution to submit on the appropriate amendments that should be made to the charges in respect of Imran.
22	CDM v CDP: Setting Aside & Enforcement of Arbitration Award - Jurisdiction & Natural Justice 20 Jul 2020 CDP (Defendant, Claimant)Won	20 Jul 2020	CDP (Defendant, Claimant): Enforcement AllowedLeave to enforce the award was granted.
23	The Micro Tellers Network v Cheng Yi Han: Mareva Injunction & Fraudulent Misrepresentation 23 Jun 2020 Providence Asset Management (Defendant)Lost	23 Jun 2020	Providence Asset Management (Defendant): Worldwide Mareva injunction granted against assetsWorldwide Mareva injunction granted against the Defendants’ assets up to the value of US$9,799,221.94 (assumed USD, as the judgment refers to amounts in USD).
24	Tembusu Growth Fund II Ltd v Yee Fook Khong: Contract Breach, Remoteness of Damages, Promissory Estoppel 19 May 2020 Tembusu Investment Management Co., Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim)Won	19 May 2020	Tembusu Investment Management Co., Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim): Claim AllowedThe court ordered the first defendant to pay RMB 30,025,000 to the plaintiffs.
25	BSM v BSN: Setting Aside Arbitral Awards for Breach of Natural Justice & Failure to Present Case 12 Aug 2019 BSM (Applicant)Lost	12 Aug 2019	BSM (Applicant): Applications DismissedBSM's applications to set aside the arbitral awards were dismissed, and BSM was ordered to pay the Companies’ costs in the sum of $28,000, inclusive of disbursements for both OS 747 and 748. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
26	Global Switch v Arup: Design Contract Dispute over Data Center Cooling & Power 09 May 2019 Arup Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	09 May 2019	Arup Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaims AllowedCounterclaims for a total of $71,347.60 under SCN003(a), SCN003(b), SCN005, SCN006 and SCN007 were allowed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
27	Public Prosecutor v Aishamudin: Trafficking Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 20 Jan 2019 Mohammad Azli bin Mohammad Salleh (Defendant)Lost	20 Jan 2019	Mohammad Azli bin Mohammad Salleh (Defendant): Guilty as chargedAzli was found guilty of abetment by intentionally aiding Roszaidi to traffic diamorphine.
28	Tembusu Growth Fund Ltd v ACTAtek, Inc: Damages for Anticipatory Breach of Contract and Loss of IPO Opportunity 18 Oct 2017 TEMBUSU GROWTH FUND LTD (Plaintiff)Partial	18 Oct 2017	TEMBUSU GROWTH FUND LTD (Plaintiff): PartialTembusu was awarded costs of S$5,000 from ACTAtek, Inc. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
29	AAHG, LLC v Hong Hin Kay Albert: Conversion of Shares, Reversionary Damage, and Unjust Enrichment 08 Dec 2016 Hong Hin Kay Albert (Defendant)Lost	08 Dec 2016	Hong Hin Kay Albert (Defendant): Claim DismissedDefendant ordered to pay the plaintiff $2,496,222.07 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
30	Re Landau: Ad Hoc Admission for CMNC's Arbitration Award Challenge 27 Nov 2016 AEI Guatemala Jaguar Ltd (Respondent)Won	27 Nov 2016	AEI Guatemala Jaguar Ltd (Respondent): Opposition UpheldJaguar opposed the application for ad hoc admission, and the application was dismissed.
31	Lembaga Tabung Angkatan Tentera (Malaysia) v Ling Lee Soon: Bankruptcy & Jurisdiction Dispute 15 Nov 2016 Lembaga Tabung Angkatan Tentera (Malaysia) (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	15 Nov 2016	Lembaga Tabung Angkatan Tentera (Malaysia) (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; bankruptcy order made against Ling Lee Soon (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
32	ACTAtek v Tembusu: Misrepresentation, Implied Terms & Breach of Contract in Convertible Loan Agreements 16 Aug 2016 TEMBUSU GROWTH FUND LTD (Respondent)Lost	16 Aug 2016	TEMBUSU GROWTH FUND LTD (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the court overturned the Judge’s findings that the Appellants were liable in the tort of deceit and that the Appellants had breached an implied term of the 2012 CLA.
33	Mount Eastern v H&C S Holdings: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Iron Ore Supply Dispute 11 Jan 2016 Mount Eastern Holdings Resources Co., Limited (Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	11 Jan 2016	Mount Eastern Holdings Resources Co., Limited (Plaintiff, Respondent): Applications granted in partLeave to enforce the Award as a judgment was granted. Costs awarded in the fixed sum of $18,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
34	H&C S Holdings v Mount Eastern: Interim Measures & Dissipation of Assets in Arbitration 20 Dec 2015 Mount Eastern Holdings Resources Co., Limited (Respondent)Won	20 Dec 2015	Mount Eastern Holdings Resources Co., Limited (Respondent): Application DismissedApplication dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
35	Tembusu Growth Fund v ACTAtek: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Breach of Contract 04 Aug 2015 TEMBUSU GROWTH FUND LTD (Plaintiff)Won	04 Aug 2015	TEMBUSU GROWTH FUND LTD (Plaintiff): Claim AllowedClaim allowed against ACTAtek, Inc for breach of contract; damages awarded in the amount of $1,500,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
36	Quek Hock Lye v PP: Constitutionality of Misuse of Drugs Act Amendment on Death Penalty 28 Jan 2015 Quek Hock Lye (Applicant)Lost	28 Jan 2015	Quek Hock Lye (Applicant): Application dismissedThe application to set aside the death sentence was dismissed.