Keuk Ping Yang

Keuk Ping Yang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2000. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in mareva injunctions and injunctions. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Keuk Ping Yang has demonstrated expertise across 12 primary practice areas, with significant experience in asset recovery and banking and finance.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Asset Recovery	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Keuk Ping Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Keuk Ping Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Keuk Ping Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Keuk Ping Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Keuk Ping Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Keuk Ping Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Keuk Ping Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Keuk Ping Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Keuk Ping Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Keuk Ping Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Keuk Ping Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Keuk Ping Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Keuk Ping Yang has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Haridass Ho & Partners	1 cases	100% of cases	Precious Wishes Ltd v Sinoble Metalloy: Contempt of Court for Mareva Injunction Breach(Jan 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Keuk Ping Yang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Keuk Ping Yang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Precious Wishes Ltd v Sinoble Metalloy: Contempt of Court for Mareva Injunction Breach 09 Jan 2000 Precious Wishes Limited (Plaintiff)Won	09 Jan 2000	Precious Wishes Limited (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; the defendants were found guilty of contempt of court.