Kevin Au

Kevin Au is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and res judicata. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kevin Au has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kevin Au has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kevin Au has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kevin Au has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kevin Au has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kevin Au has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kevin Au has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kevin Au has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kevin Au has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kevin Au has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kevin Au has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kevin Au has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kevin Au has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Express trusts	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kevin Au has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kevin Au has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Gabriel Law Corporation	2 cases	100% of cases	BNX v BOE: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Fraudulent Misrepresentation and Breach of Contract(Nov 2017) Yugoimport SDPR v Westacre Investments: Garnishee Orders & Express Trusts Dispute(Aug 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kevin Au's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.3
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Partial	17.0 parties avg	7.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kevin Au's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Partial	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	BNX v BOE: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Fraudulent Misrepresentation and Breach of Contract 20 Nov 2017 BNX (Plaintiff, Applicant)Lost	20 Nov 2017	BNX (Plaintiff, Applicant): Setting aside application dismissed; Action struck outPlaintiff's application to set aside the arbitration award was dismissed. The plaintiff's action was struck out. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Yugoimport SDPR v Westacre Investments: Garnishee Orders & Express Trusts Dispute 30 Aug 2016 Deuteron (Asia) Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent)Partial	30 Aug 2016	Deuteron (Asia) Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal allowed in partAppeal against the decision to make the garnishee order against the bank absolute was allowed.