Kevin Ho

Kevin Ho is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in professional conduct and informed consent. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kevin Ho has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in professional conduct and informed consent.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Professional conduct	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kevin Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Informed consent	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Kevin Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Kevin Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Kevin Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kevin Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kevin Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kevin Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Abetment	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kevin Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kevin Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kevin Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Medical Registration Act	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kevin Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Gynaecology	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kevin Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kevin Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Patient Autonomy	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kevin Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Healthcare Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kevin Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Medical Ethics	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kevin Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kevin Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kevin Ho has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Braddell Brothers LLP	2 cases	67% of cases	Jen Shek Wei v Singapore Medical Council: Appeal Against Disciplinary Tribunal's Decision on Professional Misconduct(Nov 2017) Yong Thiam Look Peter v Singapore Medical Council: Appeal Against Suspension for Medical Misconduct(Jan 2017)
Attorney-General’s Chambers	1 cases	33% of cases	PP v Kannan: Drug Trafficking Conspiracy under Misuse of Drugs Act(Feb 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kevin Ho's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	32.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kevin Ho's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	3(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	20,000.00	20,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Kannan: Drug Trafficking Conspiracy under Misuse of Drugs Act 14 Feb 2021 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	14 Feb 2021	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionKannan was found guilty as charged.
2	Jen Shek Wei v Singapore Medical Council: Appeal Against Disciplinary Tribunal's Decision on Professional Misconduct 12 Nov 2017 Singapore Medical Council (Respondent)Won	12 Nov 2017	Singapore Medical Council (Respondent): Judgment UpheldThe Disciplinary Tribunal's decision was upheld.
3	Yong Thiam Look Peter v Singapore Medical Council: Appeal Against Suspension for Medical Misconduct 23 Jan 2017 Singapore Medical Council (Respondent)Won	23 Jan 2017	Singapore Medical Council (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal by Dr. Yong was dismissed, and Dr. Yong was ordered to pay costs fixed at $20,000 inclusive of reasonable disbursements.