Khadijah Yasin

Khadijah Yasin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and outrage of modesty. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Khadijah Yasin has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in sentencing and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Sentencing	3 cases	17% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Khadijah Yasin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	3 cases	17% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Khadijah Yasin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Khadijah Yasin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Khadijah Yasin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Outrage of Modesty	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Khadijah Yasin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Khadijah Yasin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Khadijah Yasin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Khadijah Yasin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Khadijah Yasin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Khadijah Yasin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Khadijah Yasin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Khadijah Yasin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Importation of Drugs	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Khadijah Yasin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Khadijah Yasin has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Mahmood Gaznavi & Partners	3 cases	100% of cases	PP v Mohd Taufik: Outrage of Modesty & Knowledge of Offending Modesty(Apr 2019) A Karthik v Public Prosecutor: Abetment by Conspiracy & Probation for Young Offenders(Sep 2018) Sinnappan a/l Nadarajah v Public Prosecutor: Illegal Importation of Methamphetamine under the Misuse of Drugs Act(May 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Khadijah Yasin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Khadijah Yasin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Partial	1(33%)	33%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Mohd Taufik: Outrage of Modesty & Knowledge of Offending Modesty 02 Apr 2019 Mohd Taufik bin Abu Bakar (Respondent, Appellant)Partial	02 Apr 2019	Mohd Taufik bin Abu Bakar (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partThe appellant was acquitted on four of the six charges. His sentence in relation to the third charge was reduced from four months’ imprisonment to twelve weeks’ imprisonment. The sentence in relation to the fourth charge was upheld, which was ordered to be run concurrently with the reduced sentence for the third charge. Globally, the appellant’s sentence was therefore reduced to twelve weeks’ imprisonment.
2	A Karthik v Public Prosecutor: Abetment by Conspiracy & Probation for Young Offenders 12 Sep 2018 A Karthik (Appellant)Won	12 Sep 2018	A Karthik (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the four-month imprisonment term was set aside, and the Appellant was ordered to be placed on 24 months’ supervised probation.
3	Sinnappan a/l Nadarajah v Public Prosecutor: Illegal Importation of Methamphetamine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 02 May 2018 Sinnappan a/l Nadarajah (Appellant)Lost	02 May 2018	Sinnappan a/l Nadarajah (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against his conviction for importing methamphetamine was dismissed.