Khoo Boo Teck Randolph

Khoo Boo Teck Randolph is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 21 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in family law and child custody. Their track record shows a 29.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 14% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated expertise across 101 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and family law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	10 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 10 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Family Law	9 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized94% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	8 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Divorce	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Access to Children	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Child Support	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Care and Control	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized89% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Striking out	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Relocation of Child	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Parenting	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Amendment of Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Parental Alienation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Oral Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Maintenance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Children's Maintenance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Welfare	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Variation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
UNCITRAL Model Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Access	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Relocation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel by Convention	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shared Care and Control	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Therapeutic Counselling	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Property	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Variation of Order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sham Transaction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Novation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Distributorship Agreements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Existence of arbitration agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assignment and novation of arbitration agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Invalidity of arbitration agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inconsistency between arbitration agreement and jurisdiction clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Composition of tribunal not in accordance with agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Implied contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judicial Interviewing of Children	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Prenuptial Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Documentary Credits	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Spousal Support	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Termination	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Gifts Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Wife)	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Child)	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assignment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Khoo Boo Teck Randolph has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 21 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	21 cases	100% of cases	Lim Jinn Tonn Zanelle v Royal Amulet Pte Ltd: Winding Up Application & Solicitor Appointment Dispute(Aug 2024) Sinopec v Bank of Communications: Jurisdiction & Forum Non Conveniens in Letter of Credit Dispute(Oct 2021) VDX v VDY: Cross-Appeals on Care and Control Order Variation for Child on Chinese New Year's Eve and December Holidays(Jan 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Khoo Boo Teck Randolph's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 3 (14%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	72.4 parties avg	2.4	33%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	5%
Partial	72.6 parties avg	2.6	33%
Won	62.7 parties avg	2.7	29%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	42.5 parties avg	2.5
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	53.4 parties avg	3.4
2021	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Khoo Boo Teck Randolph's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	7(33%)	33%
Neutral	1(5%)	5%
Partial	7(33%)	33%
Won	6(29%)	29%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,346,073.73	149,563.759 cases	9
USD	2,663,347.28	1,331,673.642 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	4 13	Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)
2016	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2020	5 23	Lost: 2 cases (40.0%) Partial: 3 cases (60.0%)
2021	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 21 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lim Jinn Tonn Zanelle v Royal Amulet Pte Ltd: Winding Up Application & Solicitor Appointment Dispute 12 Aug 2024 Zanelle Lim Jinn Tonn (Claimant)Partial	12 Aug 2024	Zanelle Lim Jinn Tonn (Claimant): Application Granted in PartThe reliefs prayed for by the claimant in SUM 1460 for the Notice of Appointment and the summons and 1st affidavit of Chua Sim Bian filed in SUM 1351 on 16 May 2024 to be struck out were granted.
2	Sinopec v Bank of Communications: Jurisdiction & Forum Non Conveniens in Letter of Credit Dispute 27 Oct 2021 Bank of Communications Co Ltd (Defendant)Lost	27 Oct 2021	Bank of Communications Co Ltd (Defendant): Applications DismissedDefendant's applications challenging jurisdiction and seeking a stay of proceedings were dismissed.
3	VDX v VDY: Cross-Appeals on Care and Control Order Variation for Child on Chinese New Year's Eve and December Holidays 06 Jan 2021 VDX (Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	06 Jan 2021	VDX (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal dismissed in partMother's appeal regarding the Chinese New Year's Eve arrangements was dismissed. The court affirmed the DJ's order for C to be brought to the Father at his residence by 8.30 pm on Chinese New Year's Eve. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	VMO v VMP: Division of Matrimonial Assets in Divorce Case 30 Dec 2020 VMP (Defendant)Partial	30 Dec 2020	VMP (Defendant): Received 38% of the matrimonial assetsWife received 38% of the matrimonial assets.
5	Goodwood Associates v. Southernpec: Sham Contracts, Conspiracy & Fuel Oil Trading 04 Nov 2020 Southernpec (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim)Lost	04 Nov 2020	Southernpec (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment against the Defendant in the amount of $1,491,669.26 (assumed USD, as the judgment involves US dollar amounts and the parties are engaged in international trade).
6	UYK v UYJ: Child Relocation, Care and Control Dispute to UK 05 Jul 2020 UYK (Appellant)Lost	05 Jul 2020	UYK (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe Father's appeal against the decision to grant care and control to the Mother and allow the child to relocate to the UK was dismissed.
7	Suying Design Pte Ltd v Ng Kian Huan: Oppression of Minority Shareholders in Interior Design Business 12 May 2020 Tan Teow Feng Patty (Appellant, Respondent, Defendant, Plaintiff)Partial	12 May 2020	Tan Teow Feng Patty (Appellant, Respondent, Defendant, Plaintiff): Appeal Allowed in PartThe Court of Appeal allowed the appeal in part, setting aside the Judge's orders in respect of Mr. Ng's oppression claim.
8	BXH v BXI: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Lack of Jurisdiction & Assignment of Arbitration Agreement 01 Apr 2020 BXH (Appellant)Partial	01 Apr 2020	BXH (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part in relation to Debt B. Respondent to pay the appellant costs fixed at $50,000 inclusive of disbursements. The costs order below is also reversed in favor of the appellant. The usual consequential orders shall apply. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Suresh Agarwal v Naseer Ahmad Akhtar: Striking Out Application in Originating Summons 13 Oct 2019 Naseer Ahmad Akhtar (Respondent)Won	13 Oct 2019	Naseer Ahmad Akhtar (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; awarded costs of $10,000 from the appellant. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	BXH v BXI: Setting Aside Arbitral Award - Existence & Validity of Arbitration Agreement 02 Sep 2019 BXH (Plaintiff)Lost	02 Sep 2019	BXH (Plaintiff): Application dismissedApplication to set aside the arbitral award was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	UDF v UDG: Child Access Dispute Over Teenage Daughter's Summer Vacation 03 Jul 2017 UDF (Plaintiff)Lost	03 Jul 2017	UDF (Plaintiff): Access request declinedThe court declined to make an order for X to return to Singapore to spend part of her 2017 summer vacation with F, and declined to order that F be given interim access to X in the US during her 2017 summer vacation.
12	BNS v BNT: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Wife & Child Maintenance, and Child Custody Dispute 26 Feb 2017 BNT (Defendant)Partial	26 Feb 2017	BNT (Defendant): PartialReceived remaining monies in DBS Bank Account No. xxxxxxx84-20 and transfer of title, rights and interests in the Canadian Cottage. To pay maintenance of S$2,000 per month for 2 years to wife and S$3,000 per month per child. Also to pay for children's school fees and annual return economy ticket to Canada each year for each child.
13	AZB v AZC: Child Custody, Care and Control, and Access Dispute Post-Divorce 05 Jan 2016 AZC (Defendant)Neutral	05 Jan 2016	AZC (Defendant): Care and control order remains unchangedCare and control order remains unchanged, with the Father retaining care and control of the children.
14	THL v THM: Child Custody, Matrimonial Asset Division, and Maintenance Dispute in Divorce 08 Nov 2015 THL (Plaintiff)Partial	08 Nov 2015	THL (Plaintiff): Joint custody of childrenThe Father and the Mother shall have joint custody of T1 and T2.
15	Naseer Ahmad Akhtar v Suresh Agarwal: Quorum, Director Removal & Companies Act 01 Oct 2015 Naseer Ahmad Akhtar (Applicant)Won	01 Oct 2015	Naseer Ahmad Akhtar (Applicant): Application GrantedApplication granted; EGM to be convened with one member sufficient for quorum. Costs awarded to the plaintiff, fixed at $9,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
16	Harwindar Singh v Michael Wong: Striking Out Claim for Breach of Oral Agreement 17 May 2015 Michael Wong Lok Yung (Defendant, Appellant)Won	17 May 2015	Michael Wong Lok Yung (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed, and the Plaintiff's claim was struck out. The Plaintiff was ordered to pay the First Defendant's costs fixed at $5,500 plus reasonable disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	AQN v AQO: Prenuptial Agreement, Anti-Suit Injunction & Child Custody Dispute in Divorce Proceedings 26 Jan 2015 AQO (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	26 Jan 2015	AQO (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeals dismissedWife successfully defended against the husband's appeals (RAS 48/2014, RAS 49/2014, and RAS 50/2014). Costs will follow the event and shall be taxed if not agreed. The parties may, alternatively, apply for costs to be fixed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
18	BMP v BMQ: Contempt of Court for Breach of Mareva Injunction 04 Dec 2013 BMQ (Defendant, Appellant)Won	04 Dec 2013	BMQ (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal AllowedDefendant's appeal against the District Judge's decision was allowed.
19	Lim Leong Huat v Chip Hup Hup Kee Construction: Conspiracy & Director Liability 05 Jan 2009 Lim Leong Huat (Plaintiff, First Defendant)Won	05 Jan 2009	Lim Leong Huat (Plaintiff, First Defendant): Application AllowedApplication to add Neo Kok Eng as a defendant was allowed.
20	Chip Hup Hup Kee Construction v Lim Lian Choon: Employee Breach of Duty & Amendment of Pleadings 01 Dec 2008 Lim Lian Choon (Defendant)Lost	01 Dec 2008	Lim Lian Choon (Defendant): Application to amend pleadings grantedThe defendant opposed the plaintiff's application to amend its Reply and Defence to Counterclaim, but the application was granted, allowing the plaintiff to include a specific incident of the defendant's alleged wrongful disposal of equipment.
21	DBS Bank v Carrier Singapore: Deceit in Letter of Credit Transaction 08 Apr 2008 Carrier Singapore (Pte) Ltd (Defendant)Lost	08 Apr 2008	Carrier Singapore (Pte) Ltd (Defendant): Liable in damages for fraudulent misrepresentationThe court found Carrier liable in damages for fraudulent misrepresentation to DBS in the sum of US$1,395,748.02 less the benefit received in the sum of US$224,070. Assumed USD, as the judgment involves transactions in USD.