Khoo Boon Jin

Khoo Boon Jin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contempt of court and judge-shopping. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Khoo Boon Jin has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and civil appeals.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Khoo Boon Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Civil Appeals	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Khoo Boon Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Khoo Boon Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Khoo Boon Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Khoo Boon Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Khoo Boon Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Khoo Boon Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Judge-shopping	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Khoo Boon Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Recusal Application	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Khoo Boon Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Scandalising the judiciary	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Khoo Boon Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Khoo Boon Jin has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	1 cases	100% of cases	Attorney-General v Ong Wui Teck: Contempt of Court for Judge-Shopping(Jun 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Khoo Boon Jin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Khoo Boon Jin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	29,625.91	29,625.911 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Attorney-General v Ong Wui Teck: Contempt of Court for Judge-Shopping 09 Jun 2019 The Attorney-General (Applicant)Won	09 Jun 2019	The Attorney-General (Applicant): Judgment for ApplicantJudgment for the Attorney-General; Mr. Ong was ordered to pay the costs of SUM No 3979 of 2017 fixed at $24,000 plus disbursements of $5,625.91 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).