Khoo Lih-Han

Khoo Lih-Han is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in trademarks and trade names. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Khoo Lih-Han has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and commercial law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Khoo Lih-Han has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Khoo Lih-Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Khoo Lih-Han has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Khoo Lih-Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Khoo Lih-Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Trade names	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Khoo Lih-Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Invalidity	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Khoo Lih-Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Bad faith	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Khoo Lih-Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Ownership	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Khoo Lih-Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Khoo Lih-Han has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Mirandah Law LLP	1 cases	100% of cases	Tomy Inc v Dentsply Sirona Inc: Trade Mark Invalidity & Bad Faith Dispute(May 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Khoo Lih-Han's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Khoo Lih-Han's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Tomy Inc v Dentsply Sirona Inc: Trade Mark Invalidity & Bad Faith Dispute 19 May 2020 Dentsply Sirona Inc. (Respondent)Won	19 May 2020	Dentsply Sirona Inc. (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Dentsply Sirona Inc. entitled to costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.